The Chinese issue: I don't see the Chinese community of any hope
considering the mainland Chinese community is now basically a rotten Apple,
with acts of stalking against Hong Kong and Taiwan editors, plus history
revisionism being carried out within articles by mainland editors ans
tolerated by
lots of basic human rights are being trampled on everyday, its not uncommon
for mainland chinese editors who report on behalf of communities from
Taiwan and Hong Kong yet they never get challenged for doing so on movement
lists.
So where is the line, can it ever be a very finely detail or will
Friendly reminder: Slavery is against human rights.
From: Yaroslav Blanter
Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 2:22 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Blocking users for Palestinian flag
I do not know. Whoever puts a userbox "I support slavery" on
I do not know. Whoever puts a userbox "I support slavery" on their user
page on the English Wikipedia invites a fast block does not matter what
their edits in the articles are.
I do not think there is a universal answer to this question.
Yaroslav
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 1:31 PM Satdeep Gill
The problem is which political opinions would be acceptable on a user page, and
who gets to decide this. We are expected to edit neutrally, so expressing a
political opinion on a user page could be considered a declaration of
partisanship which could extend to editing behaviour.
Cheers,
