[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-19 Thread Lauren Worden
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:49 PM Erik Moeller wrote: > > ...With image-generating models like Stable Diffusion, it's been found > that the models sometimes generate output nearly indistinguishable > from source material [1]. I don't know if similar studies have been > undertaken for

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-19 Thread Kimmo Virtanen
> > Or, maybe just require an open disclosure of where the bot pulled from and > how much, instead of having it be a black box? "Text in this response > derived from: 17% Wikipedia article 'Example', 12% Wikipedia article > 'SomeOtherThing', 10%...". Current (ie. ChatGPT) systems doesn't work

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-19 Thread Kimmo Virtanen
In european union there is in pipeline "Regulation Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence" aka AI Act and "AI Liability Directive" (AILD). AI act text afaik is currently in finalizing phase. *

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-19 Thread Galder Gonzalez Larrañaga
Dear all,Your discussion and points are really interested. I just wanted to point that, as far as I know, "Text in this response derived from: 17% Wikipedia article 'Example', 12% Wikipedia article 'SomeOtherThing', 10%..."." Idea is impossible, as generative AIs derive from all articles or texts

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Bing-ChatGPT

2023-03-19 Thread Todd Allen
Or, maybe just require an open disclosure of where the bot pulled from and how much, instead of having it be a black box? "Text in this response derived from: 17% Wikipedia article 'Example', 12% Wikipedia article 'SomeOtherThing', 10%...". On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 10:17 PM Steven Walling wrote: