Re: [Wikimedia-l] Open Letter to Lila (Harassment Policy)

[Hong, Yena]

Uhm, was JurgenNL steward? I thought TBloemink was, not JurgenNL.

-Yena Hong (Revi)
[[User:-revi]]
-- Sent from Android --
2015. 2. 2. 오후 11:49에 "Trillium Corsage" 님이 작성:

> I wrote an open letter to Lila because I saw Philippe Beaudette saying he
> was taking advice from English Wikipedia Arbcom on the matter of offsite
> harassment. The problem is that is that Arbcom has an history of harassing.
> So it should not be giving any advice on the matter of stopping it.
>
> To make this case, I used the examples of FT2's "Anvil Email" threatening
> an editor's family and AGK's filing a trumped-up complaint to an editor's
> employer, and then on a similar theme I pointed to Wikimedia Foundation
> steward JurgenNL and administrator TBloemink's real-life stalking of
> MoiraMoira (they laughed about her on IRC and then took a train trip to
> visit her house).
>
> I won't copy-paste the whole thing here, but if you're interested you'll
> find it here: http://timsongfan.livejournal.com/1971.html. Feedback is
> welcome. I think the WMF's policy of according IP and other sensitive user
> data via checkuser and UTRS and so forth to anonymous administrators is
> creating real risks to Wikipedia editors, and that is the case I make in
> the open letter.
>
> Trillium Corsage
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Warning: "Wikimedia-l" Google Group

[Hong, Yena]

Thank you for the tip. "report abuse" did not unsub'ed me somehow.

-Yena Hong (Revi)
http://www.revi.pe.kr
-- Sent from Android --
2015. 1. 9. 오후 11:03에 "MZMcBride" 님이 작성:

> Austin Hair wrote:
> >You may have already received a message indicating that you've been
> >added to the "Wikimedia-l" Google Group; if not, you likely will soon.
>
> I've had difficulty using the Web unsubscribe form, so I've been
> unsubscribing from this repeated stupidity exclusively via e-mail, which
> seems to work much better.
>
> For example, you can e-mail wikimedia-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com to
> begin the process. You'll receive a confirmation e-mail, you reply to the
> confirmation e-mail, and then you're successfully unsubscribed.
>
> I already view Google pretty skeptically, but allowing its system to be
> abused like this seems downright negligent. Subscribing to a mailing list
> should, of course, require confirmation. And lists ("Google Groups") that
> are being used only to personate and troll should be disabled immediately.
>
> MZMcBride
>
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] How to fix Commons

[Hong, Yena]

There are lots of "unidentified (blah blah)" categories - such as birds,
cars, flowers, and etc etc. How about these categories?

-Yena Hong (Revi)
[[User:-revi]]
-- Sent from Android --
2014. 12. 13. 오후 5:08에 "Andre Engels" 님이 작성:

> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 5:33 AM, svetlana 
> wrote:
>
> > MZMcBride wrote:
> >> As much as the term is an awful buzzword, Commons could also do with
> >> additional gamification, from what I've seen. If we can set up an easy
> >> keyword/tagging system, having users help us sort and tag media would be
> >> amazing.
> >
> > We already have such system. It's called categories. If we would like to
> build a prettier interface for it, I'm all ears (although I wouldn't call
> it a game).
>
> Gamification here relates to one type of interface, where a user gets
> supplied a random example of an issue, and then tries to resolve that,
> with a single resolution being just a small task. For an example of
> what that looks like in a Wikimedia- context, see the Wikidata game at
> https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/. A game could for example be
> used to re-categorize files in categories that are too general (like
> [[Category:People]]), to categorize uncategorized images or to add a
> certain type of category to files where for some reason it seems
> likely to apply (for example, images that in some way are described as
> paintings which have no author-category).
>
>
> --
> André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] A decision in Commons regarding URAA affected files

[Hong, Yena]

Seems Jusjih confirmed closure at [1].

[1]:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Massive_restoration_of_deleted_images_by_the_URAA&diff=120699261&oldid=120619620

-Yena Hong (Revi)
Wikimedian
https://keybase.io/revi
-- Sent from Android --
2014. 4. 5. 오후 6:36에 "Michael Maggs" 님이 작성:

> The crats are aware of this and are discussing it.
>
> Michael
>
> On 4 Apr 2014, at 01:29, Russavia  wrote:
>
> > Yael, et al
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is a case of premature congratulation.
> >
> > I have let the Bureaucrats know of this issue at
> >
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#This_projects_bureaucrat.27s_are_asleep_at_the_wheel.3F_--_please_wake_upand
> > on their individual talk pages.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Russavia
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Yael Meron 
> wrote:
> >
> >> After a discussion[1] in Commons regarding this subject, a decision was
> >> made, stating that URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion.
> >>
> >> We consider this a good solution for this situation, considering there
> is
> >> currently no foreseeable change in US law, for example, to accept the
> "rule
> >> of the shorter term".
> >>
> >> Following our letter[1] and this decision, we would like to thank
> everyone
> >> who supported this, including the WMF BoT, the legal department
> >> (specifically Yana), WMES, WMAR, WMVE, the administrators in Commons and
> >> the participants in the discussion.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Yael Meron
> >> Board of Wikimedia Israel
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Massive_restoration_of_deleted_images_by_the_URAA
> >> [2]
> >>
> >>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Israel/Letter_to_the_BoT_regarding_URAA
> >> ___
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> >> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> 
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,