e program to continue. I was not advocating that the WMF be involved
> in Malleus's specific debate.
>
While I agree completely with what you say, Dan, I think it would be a good
idea to start the discussion with a coherent definition and/or description
of the English Wikipedia's "governance structure".
And, a discussion of the work environment of the Project is very much worth
it's own thread.
Marc Riddell
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Folks, if this has already been brought to the List, please excuse the
repetition. If not, enjoy;
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/romneys-running-mate-some-say-
wikipedia-holds-the-answer/?nl=us&emc=edit_cn_20120810
Marc Rid
vik-my-biggest
->> i
>>> nfluence-was-wikipedia-2012-4#ixzz1sN3LZci6
On 18 April 2012 13:55, Marc Riddell wrote:
>>
>> Unless he expanded on his statement, which isn't in the posted clip, his
>> "answer" could very well be a sarcastic non-answer to an ent
he expanded on his statement, which isn't in the posted clip, his
"answer" could very well be a sarcastic non-answer to an entity he believes
has neither credibility nor authority over him.
Marc Riddell
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
W