>
>
> Am I correct to summorise here than that CU works because people don't
> know it doesn't?
>
> Almost. It works because people don't know how, don't care how, or don't
think they are attracting enough attention to avoid being targeted.
___
Wikimedia-
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Martijn Hoekstra wrote:
> Two points that might help bring people on different sides of the
> issue closer together.
>
> 1. How about notifying people that they have been check-usered 2
> months after the fact? By that time I hope all investigations are
> complete
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:36 AM, David Richfield
wrote:
> So User:mfgaowener should get an automated mail saying "because you
> did a pagemove with edit summary "Haers!" you were checkusered.
> Please be more subtle in your vandalism next time."
>
> I trust the current checks and balances, and
Automatically adjusting the email frequency might be a worthwhile feature
to strive for:
If an editor hasn't logged in within the past 30 days, revert to monthly
digest, that way we don't drive editors away with the email frequency.
-Stephanie
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:07 PM, John Vandenberg wr
