I was responding to Andreas' comment on Wiki-PR's socks, specifically. I do
not know the full story on Sarah yet, and agree I'd like to hear her side.
On Jan 6, 2014 7:24 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 January 2014 13:43, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
... The community expects
Thanks indeed. It's awfully nice to know all that time I've put in over the
years has gone somewhere. This thing that millions of people have made is
truly amazing and has brought knowledge to probably billions, and it's good
to keep that in sight every so often.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:08 PM,
life. Why should I? I'm not subject to them.
Todd Allen
--
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:35 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Todd Allen wrote:
[comments about VisualEditor]
Hi Todd.
Thank you for writing this e-mail. Unfortunately I don't have a
particularly unified reply to write here, but I can offer five thoughts.
Regarding the specific
opt-out for editors who would like to use it, not only during
beta.
Regards,
Todd Allen
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
Also keep in mind that WMF has explicitly stated that they received no such
demand. If they had, they still could say If we had received such a
demand, we couldn't legally discuss it, still comply with the order, and
let us read between the lines. While I don't always agree with WMF, I have
more
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Hoi,
Sorry Fred, I do not like your post. The quote has it wrong because
research shows that it is factually wrong. Wikipedia has a better
coverage
at a superior quality to the encyclopaedia that went before.
editor would need is madness.
Todd Allen
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
*Answer the Second*
*
*
This sort of thing is handled much better in the German Wikipedia. In the
German Wikipedia, companies can edit with verified company accounts: so
that if Coca-Cola Germany edits the Coca-Cola article, it will actually say
Coca Cola Germany in the edit history.
told We disapprove of this action. Do we talk around it
and leave more resentment to linger? Or do you listen and reverse it?
Thanks if you took the time to read all this. I see a precipice, too. Let's
all step back.
Regards,
Todd Allen
On May 12, 2013 7:04 PM, Philippe Beaudette phili
This is terrible to hear. We've lost a brilliant mind far too soon.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 5:04 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Killed himself.
http://tech.mit.edu/V132/N61/swartz.html
- d.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Upperarm.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arm.agr.jpg would probably be a
better example.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 August 2012 22:56, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
So this is a balancing act - but I'm not currently sure which side outweighs
the other, or whether the two sides are currently balancing each other
Long as it's getting top-posted anyway...
First, copying is not and cannot be theft. That's not to say it's
always legally or ethically acceptable, mind you, but it's not theft.
In legal terms, there was a court case over that particular matter,
that ruled someone could not be charged on a
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Many images on Wikipedia have been taken without the subject's genuine
consent. So surely that isn't the issue.
Many are transferred to Commons from
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, actually, along with several other educational ones, some with
children's games, her school website, etc. The chances that she would
randomly
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 18.06.2012 15:06, schrieb Thomas Morton:
I don't think that we need this argument since the filter can't replace
parents
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
My middle one can very
briefly go online alone to a few sites I've already agreed to, and I
check up on her a lot.
Is Wikipedia one of those few sites
, or Muhammad on that article, to the
content disclaimer, tell them that yes, they will actually get an
article on what they specifically look for one for, that yes, we use
multimedia illustrations when we have appropriately licensed and
relevant media, and move on.
Todd Allen
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:42 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2012 20:30, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
14 years is a fine place to start. Are there any existing campaigns
pushing for it? S.
Now that I'm looking, I can't find any campaigns as such!
I thought
201 - 221 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
