I've asked for the reasons to mix those two totally different type of seats in
2021 on the discussion page of the board[1], but I never got any answer besides
''the board decided this way'', which is in no way a valid decision process for
community matters in the Wikiverse.
I've asked again on
This should be '''The''' Community wishlist, one for the whole bunch of devs
that are supposed to be working for us editors.
Ther is up to now no option to make any wishes to all those myriads of devs,
whose workforce is wasted on such useless and unwanted pet-projects like FLOW
or ReBrand or
@Pelagic:
As I just saw, that you were referring to an even older post, that was
about this section on the same talk page, the talk page on Meta about
the changes. That's the first place to look for such stuff, as that's
the most legitimate place for such discussions. Where did you expect this?
@Pelagic:
The last update I know of is this here from November 17:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/October_2020_-_Call_for_feedback_about_Bylaws_changes_and_Board_candidate_rubric#Update_after_the_Board_Governance_Committee_meeting_on_Nov_17
Greetings
Hi Leinonen,
In Germany we have several kind of co-editing spaces, listed here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community-Space
In addition there are as well several "Stammtische" (well, at least
usually, currently of course not):
I fully subscribe to that notion. The board has to be equipped with
members, who are primarily selected for their adherence with the core
values of the Wikiverse, the five pillars[1]. The WMF is not, and should
never be, anything like a corporation, it's an educational charitable
non-profit NGO.
