23_Report>
Best regards,
*Anthony Diaz*
*Wiki Advocates Philippines Inc., Co-founder*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikime
23_Report>
Best regards,
*Anthony Diaz*
*Wiki Advocates Philippines Inc., Co-founder*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wi
On 13th June, the High Court of Australia allowed a defamation case against
Google to proceed. Presently, Australia has no "safe harbour" provision
for internet intermediaries, though there is some protection for telcos.
[1]
The previous week, on 7th June, the New South Wales state government
It's still there. Still linking to a local Kmart store. I'll email legal
and point them to this thread.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, 8:35 PM Samuel Klein wrote:
> Yea, looks like a K*mart ad.
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 2:55 AM Jan Ainali wrote:
>
> > Well, I guess Occam
Thank you Gnangarra.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, 12:44 PM Gnangarra wrote:
> >
> > No
> >> thing to do with Wikimedia Australia, we have made no such request.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> G
> angarra
> .
> Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
>
Thanks Joseph. How weird.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 at 3:01 pm, Joseph Seddon <jsed...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hey Anthony,
>
> Apologies for the delay on this.
>
> To the best of our knowledge, this ad isn't being run by the Wikimedia
> Foundation nor any vendor of
t; > organized group harassment, and open hostility on the English
> > Wikipedia, I'm not sure we can even call it "the encyclopedia anyone
> > can edit" anymore. So I'd say fact-checked is a more accurate and
> > relevant claim these days.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr
gt; YouTube
> > a Facebook to use our data over them not to do so over license issues.
> > Remember the days when Wikipedia was young; it was a wide held belief.
> > Thanks,
> >GerardM
> >
> > On 16 April 2018 at 01:53, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com>
Thank you, Philippe and Joseph.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 8:22 am, Joseph Seddon <josephsed...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey Anthony.
>
> These emails came in on a weekend and today is a WMF holiday so I suspect
> it'll be another 24 hours or so before a response will get to you :)
&g
imedia-l] The fact-checked encyclopedia
> >>
> >> Considering the barriers to entry, growing thicket of policies,
> >> organized group harassment, and open hostility on the English
> >> Wikipedia, I'm not sure we can even call it "the encyclopedia anyone
> >
Is someone from WMF monitoring wikimedia-l and notifying relevant employees
when an issue arises under their remit? This issue - big companies using
our writing without attribution and like-licensing - has been hanging with
no word from the WMF for six months.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018
e
> can edit" anymore. So I'd say fact-checked is a more accurate and
> relevant claim these days.
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just googled “wikipedia” and the first result was a Google ad linking
> to
> > wikip
Link to a screen-shot of the ad: https://instagram.com/p/Bhl01fhhXHT/
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 at 8:53 pm, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just googled “wikipedia” and the first result was a Google ad linking to
> wikipedia.org.[1] It calls Wikipedia the fact-checked ency
and
oversight I'm not sure we can ethically assert. I missed the discussion
about this new self-description. Did it happen on meta? Is anyone else
uncomfortabe with this?
--
Anthony Cole
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
te my work and share it with the same rights attached.
If it is the opinion of the WMF that these smart assistants are not
breaching my rights, I'd like to see the legal advice that opinion is based
on.
1.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/24/are-corporations-that-use-wikipedia-giving-back/
Anthony Cole
On Thu,
We're not at that point yet. I would like to know whether an informal
conversation between WMF and Amazon on this topic has begun, though.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Kunal Mehta <lego...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/04/2018 08:36 PM, Anthony Cole
tion, but for copyleft to be preserved.
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Adele and Yongmin. I'll ask Barbara to clarify next time we
> chat.
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 at 12:49 am, Yongmin H. <li...@revi
.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_2030/Process_planning=prev=17657673
On 8 Jan 2018 1:03 AM, "James Salsman" <jsals...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> I've been working on
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_2030/Process_planning which
>
t;, which
means identifying the resources needed for execution, and the activities it
involves." [1]
Anthony Cole
1.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Direction/Endorsement
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, g
s spam.
> Please use https://encrypt.to/0x947f156f16250de39788c3c35b625da5beff197a.
>
> 2017. 9. 22. 01:27, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> 작성:
>
> > I was speaking with Barbara Page last night (Barbara's highlighting of
> this
> > issue in a Wikipediocracy blog post
> > http://wikip
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> &g
Thank you Andrew for the recordings and Leila for the links.
On 27 May 2017 3:59 PM, "NC Hasive" wrote:
> Thanks Andrew and Leila. Happy to watch.
>
>
> -Hasive
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Edward Galvez
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Andrew and Leila -
Outstanding (normal for Hebrew Wikipedia)
On 30 Dec 2016 8:49 AM, "Sam Klein" wrote:
> Huzzah! Congrats, and thanks for sharing this, Itzik :)
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Itzik - Wikimedia Israel <
> it...@wikimedia.org.il> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm happy
ility of unintended access to user accounts by unauthorized
parties.
Additional information may be found at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_session_reset.
--
Darian Anthony Patrick
App. Security Engineer
IRC: dapatrick
Wikis: DPatrick (WMF)
--
Thank you so much for pulling all that together, Cornelius. An excellent
resource for us who didn't make it to the conference.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Andy Cruz y Corro <andyc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Cornelius! Just FYI: the documentation link seems to
time.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) <
nwil...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> With regard to "[the WMF board] delivering services that are of a high
> &g
ot;professional", if that's what you're doing,
strikes me as a bit sly.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 May 2016 at 23:27, James Heilman <jmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > On the other hand, I however, had requested mu
The Signpost has just published the October 2015 email exchange between
James and Jimmy - the exchange that Jimmy wouldn't release.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-04-24/Op-ed
Thank you Signpost.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Anthony Cole
ising, opportunistic
squatter.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 April 2016, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hoi,
> > Governance worth a damn... Did you know that
ain things to the
other trustees?
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Ting Chen <wing.phil...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> in my opinion a board member should not foster his or her own pet
> projects. The WMF board members are leading a global movement. When
&g
Ugh. Sorry. I mean: should involvement in and advocacy for a particular
movement initiative disqualify one from voting on motions related to that
initiative?
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jytdog, regarding:
>
>
d by a community who, I think,
expected you to create an environment where Wikidata could flourish. Is it
a bad thing to have advocates for movement initiatives on the board?
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good points wo
to manage, Denny had the wisdom to step
away.
He's an enormous asset to this movement; as I said, we're lucky to have
him, and I'm very grateful for all he's contributed.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:44 PM, jytdog <jyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is kind of frustrating. Lila
doubt that would be offset by the saved hosting costs. But I'm no expert on
these things.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:46 AM, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote:
> Anthony Cole wrote:
> >Google's "info boxes" and their answers at the top of their results, we're
e're lucky to have someone with Denny's ability and
integrity bridging the two. But it's just untenable for him to sit on the
board of trustees while he's in those roles.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andre...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>
That RFC is 20 months old. That media viewer is not today's media viewer.
Anthony Cole
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org>
wrote:
> On 16-03-14 10:59 AM, Nathan wrote:
> > the non-participation of
> > non-participants can't render
ple button that smoothly reads an article to me,
like a podcast, with fast forward and rewind or skip, while I do the dishes
would be cool. I hope they're not going to try to re-invent JAWS, though.
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com>
I'd use it for most of my citations if it also worked for users of screen
readers. But I can't bring myself to add a feature to an article that isn't
accessible by the sight impaired.
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Peter Southwood <
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net>
Ugh. This: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Ref_supports2#Example
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ugh.I just edited the page and now it's not working. Try this:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Ref_suppo
Ugh.I just edited the page and now it's not working. Try this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Ref_supports2/Example
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding "Unless I missed it, there is no good way to automatic
t in a way that screen
readers can read it.
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ah. You mean you're counting all footnote marke
Thanks, Marc. That's a relief.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org> wrote:
> On 2016-03-12 6:31 AM, Anthony Cole wrote:
>
>> I've lost track of where that's at.
>>
>
> Well, there was a consultation involving to
of those paragraphs would be counted as unsourced
statements.
But, really, who cares? The whole thing is a non-argument. It just doesn't
matter which project is more poorly referenced.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Magnus, I'v
l seem to think the problem with the roll-out of the media viewer
and visual editor was the stoopid power users.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:27 PM Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
Gnangarra,
I was away when Andy was here, and am really regretting missing his
presentation. Can you explain to me why the Wikidata people have to make a
wikidata item of every source before they can cite it?
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.
Sorry, there's a typo in that last paragraph. It should read:
The sound argument coming from above is the cry from Gerrard and others
that it is hideously difficult to add citations to Wikidata *statements*.
If that is so, you should fix that.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:27 PM
rom above is the cry from Gerrard and others
that it is hideously difficult to add citations to Wikidata sources. If
that is so, you should fix that.
1. http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=378
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote
I've lost track of where that's at.
Anthony Cole
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
. Thank
you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank
you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. etc. ...
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Bodhisattwa Mandal <
bodhisattwa.rg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow! Its really awesome. It was much needed.
>
&g
the "founder's seat"
now, and run for a community seat at the next community selection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_202#Your_role_as_spokesperson_for_the_Wikimedia_movement
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Michel Vuijlsteke <wikipe...@z
Recordings of board meetings will be of value to future historians.
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Whether to record meetings is a separate question from whether to release
> the recordings publicly.
>
views must have caused.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Keegan Peterzell <keegan.w...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just thought Mr. Kolbe's mother didn't hug him enough as a baby.
> towards them.
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wi
the purse strings,
as opposed to the current situation where the techie tail wags the
encyclopaedist dog.
Anthony Cole
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Pharos <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi fellow Wikimedians,
>
> If we are seriously going to consider an expanded Co
or me to publish this private email - it still touches on matters
that are not public.
..."
Anthony Cole
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:52 AM, SarahSV <sarahsv.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:39 PM, SarahSV <sarahsv.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Jimmy, would
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@li
de whole ranges of issues based on some vague qualification
> that may or may not have foundation in reality. If there is a specific
> example that is terrible and you'd like to bring up, then do so.
>
> Lodewijk
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com
> &
ia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_transparency_gap#Transparency_about_donor-funded_work_supporting_commercial_re-users
> > > > ___
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimed
reasons, that's
fine. But I'd like to know what is at the heart of the WMF's practice here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Florence Devouard <fdevou...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am not a lawyer so would
Florence, can you explain to me the actual risk the foundation would be
exposed to if ir got involved in editorial decisions, please? Perhaps some
hypothetical examples would help.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Florence Devouard <fdevou...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Le 27/02
s to specify what "some" means. Or perhaps you could just be
specific in the code of conduct.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:51 PM, James Alexander <jalexan...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&g
Can we see your NDA please, Oliver?
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Something that I would like to understand is why so much WMF information is
> cloaked under NDAs. It seems to me that this is philosophically at odds
>
d, I think, Pete Forsyth recommends that
the interim ED be clearly and purely an interim, not a probationary ED, and
I'm persuaded by his arguments.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Balázs Viczián <balazs.vicz...@wikimedia.hu
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> reading all th
There will be an AllHands staff discussion about recent events tomorrow,
per Katherine Maher on Facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/wikipediaweekly/permalink/963758547005310/?comment_id=963762980338200_comment_id=963831903664641_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R3%22%7D
Anthony Cole
On Fri, Feb
Thanks for your support over your time here, Lila. It's been invaluable.
All the best for the future.
Anthony Cole
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Leinonen Teemu <teemu.leino...@aalto.fi>
wrote:
> Thank you Lila for keeping things moving. Continuous development is the
> only
I think we agree on the important points. There's a huge potential in
Wikidata, and it looks like it's in good hands. Commons could be so much
better than it is.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hoi,
> Nice that
, sister-projects - too often lose sight of the fact that
all of them have yet to prove they have had any significant measurable
impact on the distribution of knowledge.
So, forgive me if I sometimes forget to include them in my thinking.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen
ing should be overseeing it, not the people who
keep the servers running.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:46 AM, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> More focused but where I was trying to go. Thank you.
>
> Perhaps two C level positions, Chief Editor Offi
the
encyclopaedia-makers have generated. If the WMF decides to hold on to all
that moolah, shame on them.
But I assume it won't come to that: neither the parting of the ways nor, if
that does come to pass, the WMF keeping the money.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Keegan Peterzell
Sorry, the above post is initially addressing Sarah.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WMF is a technology company. We are an encyclopaedia, an educational
> institution. We need them like I need a mechanic to keep my car o
. But
this tail-wagging-dog thing is just not right.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sarah, I'd prefer to see the "keeping the servers running" role completely
> separate from the community. As an organised c
contractor to "keep the servers running." Organised, we - the people who
actually created this thing and actively maintain it - could set the course
for its development.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sara
are
atomised, the latter is our only option. Organised, forking becomes a
serious possibility. Of course, I hope it never comes to that. But without
that possibility, we are in the position of just having to take whatever
from the WMF - good and bad.
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, SarahSV
on, that would be a very good start.
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Thank you for sharing this. It's a very interesting, highly detailed
> exposition of the history of Flow, and its predecessor, LiquidThreads. (And
> so
gt; https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org <javascrip
Wrong link. It's here.
http://wikipediocracy.com/2015/02/08/the-dream-that-died-erik-moller-and-the-wmfs-decade-long-struggle-for-the-perfect-discussion-system/
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This time last year, Scott Martin wrote up
nes
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> __
Theo wrote: "PS Anthony, you shouldn't have sent a private email to the
list."
Yep. It won't happen again. It was an over-reaction to exactly what you're
calling out in your post: people having the temerity to tell others to shut
up, based mainly on their discomfort with the view be
. Literally.
Ever. I assume it will be the last. That kind of thing, bullying people
into silence, quietly, off-list, is IMNSHO, poor behaviour, billinghurst.
Anthony Cole
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Lees <emufarm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone complained to you off-l
Danny, four months ago the board decided to give her time. The vocal staff
have responded by rejecting that. The board needs to reconsider, in light
of that response, and either confirm their commitment to the ED or come to
a different resolution. Soon, preferably.
On 23 Feb 2016 12:09 am, "Danny
I found this response interesting. It highlights the imbalance we, on the
outside, are having to deal with. It is OK for anyone to criticize the ED
on this list and elsewhere but if she says something that implies
shortcomings on the part of one or more of her staff or former staff - and
if WMF
I hope to see some rigorous, independent analysis of the current crisis,
once the dust has settled. It'd be nice for that to be initiated and funded
outside the WMF but with their full cooperation. Is there a charitable
foundation whose mission would cover this?
Anthony Cole
On Mon, Feb 22
gt; New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Anthony Cole
_
ur]]/[[User:Jalexander-WMF]]
>
> Personal capacity, as signaled by my email address, but since some complain
> I don't make it clear my role in WMF when I send this type of email: I am
> also the Manager of Trust & Safety
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Anthony Cole
I know.
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Brion Vibber <bvib...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > * The Community Resources Team is in place - it surveyed the community
>
Those who have been demonstrating gross disrespect for the ED
over the last few days need to leave.
Anthony Cole
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:02 AM, James Heilman <jmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree having all board members engage with the community in their own
> voice is l
Thank you, James.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:33 AM, James Alexander <jalexan...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When one's available, would someone please post a link to the transcri
ot the memo. I
think "advised" is enough, and if the board wants more engagement, they can
initiate it - presuming the notification is clear and comprehensive, of
course.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure abo
the board should be *consulted* ahead of such
applications' or should prior-approve all such applications. That seems a
bit like micromanagement. But it makes sense to me for the board to be *advised
*of such applications and when they're being actively contemplated or
prepared.
Anthony Cole
On F
When one's available, would someone please post a link to the transcript?
Anthony Cole
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Karen Brown <kbr...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Community Engagement department will be hosting an IRC office hour this
> Friday, th
It was obviously evolving as the project moved from initial
conceptualisation to the establishment of the Discovery team but,
nevertheless, a clear, meaningful statement of the vision for the project
(as it was imagined at the time) would have been appropriate when the team
was put together. I
Congratulations, Jethro. Nice work.
Anthony Cole
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Chris Schilling <cschill...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> (Cross-posted to a number of mailing lists)
>
> Last December, I sent out an invitation to
> [[m:Grants:IdeaLab/Futur
wrote:
> Hoi,
> Money would be spend for what ? When reliability is the big issue, the only
> issue, we would be Nupedia and not Wikipedia.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 31 January 2016 at 14:53, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>&
#Reliability
--
Anthony Cole
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Excellent. Bearing in mind Kat's points, you might consider appointing
experts for the duration of specific projects or until predetermined goals
have been achieved, or for fixed periods with the clear prior understanding
that renewall is unlikely. (You can always offer renewal at the end of a
and
monitor our course to our shared vision.
Anthony Cole
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've never understood why corporate appointees like Guy Kawasaki or the
> just-departed Arnnon Geshuri are voting board members, inst
/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Gu
That was enlightening. Thank you Andy.
Anthony Cole
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
wrote:
> Given recent issues, I found last night's episode of 'The Bottom Line':
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bottom_Line_%28radio_program
Thank you Lila. That's very clear, and I think it's a worthwhile project,
exactly in line with our shared vision.
Anthony Cole
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Lila Tretikov <l...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Thank you, Sarah for an excellent question. Sometimes I compare
dia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Anthony Cole
___
Wikimedia-
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo