I don't support that statement from Todd , that is not how a board of a
foundantion works ..
please refer to the statutory (bylaws) provisions, that might be how
todd ideally would like things to function
but that is not much more then wishfull thinking .
Derek
On 10-05-16 01:46, Yann
On 04-05-16 13:48, Chris Keating wrote:
A procedural question: Is the chapters' vote binding on the board, or is it
the same as for the three community board seats, where the community
members selected in the community vote are merely recommendations that the
sitting board is free to accept or
I second that Gerard
On 16-04-16 08:16, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
You are welcome to your opinion about Jimmy Fae. But honestly. I think you
have gone into a direction where I fail to follow you nor do I see a
benefit. I also fail to understand why you have it in for Jimmy, it comes
over as
Hello everyone ,
I agree with Fae and Craig,
It's foreign jargon especially in this context , and on top of that
jargon form a professional background where the term has been misused
(imho)
It has in my jargon the connotation of obsessively recurring idea , like
a depressed patient
always
t to kick off a
new thread to avoid the appearance of a pileon.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Derek V.Giroulle
<derekvgirou...@wikimedia.be> wrote:
Hello everyone ,
I agree with Fae and Craig,
It's foreign jargon especially in this context , and on top of that
jargon
form a professional backgro
wiki
philosofy/practise side of things
but to me Gerards reaction was applicable in tho most general of ways
Derek
On 13-03-16 15:26, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
On 2016-03-13 10:06 AM, Derek V.Giroulle wrote:
looks like a modern religion, with its proper dogma and clergy.
... I'm sorry
I wholeheartedly agree with Gerard.
During the conference by the KNAW ( academy of sciences) in Amsterdam
when the Wikipedia community received from HM Willem Alexander of the
Netherlands the Erasmusaward
Philosofy Professer Jos De Mul ( Erasmus university of Rotterdam) , who
specialises in
I second that
On 11-03-16 16:10, Victor Grigas wrote:
What a good message to wake up to!
I'd like to politely suggest along with any decision making ahead, that the
board please leave the door open to considering Katherine as permanent
executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation.
--
.
A trade union often provides legal aid when necessary and no way in hell
should a company be allowed to interfere in this.
Thanks,
GerardN
On 9 March 2016 at 13:06, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 9 March 2016 at 09:50, Derek V.Giroulle <derekvgirou...@wikimedia.
Gordo ,
a) Wikimedia UK does have anything to say about unions its employees
are free to join a union
b) In france , belgium , the netherlands , germany, scandianavian
countries, austria even swtizerland any worker (wage earning) is free
to join a labourunion and about 80% of private
Pine ,
One of the things iḿ missing is the wiki movement is an independant
judiciary
The Wiki community does not apply the following principles :
- Presumtion of innocence : Innocent until proven guilty
- Favor of the doubt for the accused
- Clear procedure
- No independant judges : often
was what I qualified as disrespectful of a valuable
person.
Ruslanś _remarks_ were imho not questioning the WMF decisions or the
selection/decision proces,
he was attacking the outcome ... I read that in Maggieś response also
Derek
On 27-02-16 21:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 20
Congratulations to Katy, welcome to your new assignment.
I'm very sorry that Ruslan Takayev's message got through the moderation
IMHO his statement and remarks are not respectful
it was essential to have someone appointed to fill Siko's position
quickly an obviously
quickly often means
13 matches
Mail list logo
