Re: [Wikimedia-l] Open Letter to Lila (Harassment Policy)
Uhm, was JurgenNL steward? I thought TBloemink was, not JurgenNL. -Yena Hong (Revi) [[User:-revi]] -- Sent from Android -- 2015. 2. 2. 오후 11:49에 Trillium Corsage trillium2...@yandex.com님이 작성: I wrote an open letter to Lila because I saw Philippe Beaudette saying he was taking advice from English Wikipedia Arbcom on the matter of offsite harassment. The problem is that is that Arbcom has an history of harassing. So it should not be giving any advice on the matter of stopping it. To make this case, I used the examples of FT2's Anvil Email threatening an editor's family and AGK's filing a trumped-up complaint to an editor's employer, and then on a similar theme I pointed to Wikimedia Foundation steward JurgenNL and administrator TBloemink's real-life stalking of MoiraMoira (they laughed about her on IRC and then took a train trip to visit her house). I won't copy-paste the whole thing here, but if you're interested you'll find it here: http://timsongfan.livejournal.com/1971.html. Feedback is welcome. I think the WMF's policy of according IP and other sensitive user data via checkuser and UTRS and so forth to anonymous administrators is creating real risks to Wikipedia editors, and that is the case I make in the open letter. Trillium Corsage ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Warning: Wikimedia-l Google Group
Thank you for the tip. report abuse did not unsub'ed me somehow. -Yena Hong (Revi) http://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- 2015. 1. 9. 오후 11:03에 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com님이 작성: Austin Hair wrote: You may have already received a message indicating that you've been added to the Wikimedia-l Google Group; if not, you likely will soon. I've had difficulty using the Web unsubscribe form, so I've been unsubscribing from this repeated stupidity exclusively via e-mail, which seems to work much better. For example, you can e-mail wikimedia-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com to begin the process. You'll receive a confirmation e-mail, you reply to the confirmation e-mail, and then you're successfully unsubscribed. I already view Google pretty skeptically, but allowing its system to be abused like this seems downright negligent. Subscribing to a mailing list should, of course, require confirmation. And lists (Google Groups) that are being used only to personate and troll should be disabled immediately. MZMcBride ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] How to fix Commons
There are lots of unidentified (blah blah) categories - such as birds, cars, flowers, and etc etc. How about these categories? -Yena Hong (Revi) [[User:-revi]] -- Sent from Android -- 2014. 12. 13. 오후 5:08에 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com님이 작성: On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 5:33 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote: MZMcBride wrote: As much as the term is an awful buzzword, Commons could also do with additional gamification, from what I've seen. If we can set up an easy keyword/tagging system, having users help us sort and tag media would be amazing. We already have such system. It's called categories. If we would like to build a prettier interface for it, I'm all ears (although I wouldn't call it a game). Gamification here relates to one type of interface, where a user gets supplied a random example of an issue, and then tries to resolve that, with a single resolution being just a small task. For an example of what that looks like in a Wikimedia- context, see the Wikidata game at https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/. A game could for example be used to re-categorize files in categories that are too general (like [[Category:People]]), to categorize uncategorized images or to add a certain type of category to files where for some reason it seems likely to apply (for example, images that in some way are described as paintings which have no author-category). -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
