Maybe let's not turn this into a debate about what epistemology is.
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 16:26, John Erling Blad wrote:
> To be an organization so devoted to knowledge, Wikimedia as such (the
> projects communities included) knows very lit
Please please please take this conversation to another venue. It has little
to nothing to do with this movement.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 18:15, geni wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 07:23, James Salsman wrote:
> > Geni, it's the "Day of the Dead" now so I want to attempt to resurrect
That does sound like a pretty cool idea. :)
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 13:23 Pine W wrote:
> Thanks for the input. I had been thinking of this as a meeting where
> useful communications and discussions would happen, but maybe going in the
> opposite direction would have more appeal. I could
Thehelpfulone hasn't died. :) He's been hugely busy in real life, is all.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 at 21:25 Pine W wrote:
> I regret seeing THO fade away. I found him to be likable, polite, and
> I think well of Shani, and as she already has some experience
It looks like the page Maor refers to near the end there is this one:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 at 15:06 Maor Malul wrote:
> Dear all,
> Recognition as a Wikimedia affiliate - a chapter, thematic organization,
> or user group - is a
Hey Lodewijk - looks like there is at least some indication on the "Work
with us" page here: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Work_with_us
They're looking for two of:
- Growing a Global Movement
- Engaging New Communities
- Social Sector Governance
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 at
There's the GLAM-Wiki documentary that Rock drum and I put together back in
2013 with the support of Wikimedia UK:
It has translatable subtitles in a bunch of languages too :)
Gnangarra - perhaps it should be wikimania-...@lists.wikimedia.org ?
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 at 01:27 Gnangarra wrote:
> well tried to submit Perth bid to the email supplied and the response was;
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Gerard, I feel like you are basically describing the role of the Wikimedia
Blog. Is that incorrect?
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 11:35 Gerard Meijssen
> Wikipedia is not my thing. I hardly ever write on articles. The article
> states that Rosie wrote 1000
Yes, that would be original research and not permitted on the English
On Tuesday, 8 March 2016, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Dear Ruslan,
> please reply to my questions below. I've been waiting all along.
> Shlomi Fish
> On Mon, 25 Jan
Y'know, maybe it's a good thing when this list is quiet. Saves my inbox
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 18:11 Lydia Pintscher
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:44 PM Yaroslav M. Blanter
> > On 2016-02-24 18:39, Milos Rancic wrote:
> > >
Thanks, Damon. It all makes sense now.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 at 15:55 Damon Sicore wrote:
> To All,
> Just to mark this moment, or maybe remind those who paid attention when I
> published these, some long before I vanished in silence:
I imagine it would take something quite extraordinary for the board to
reject the community election result outright, as it happens. I would
assume the "nomination v selection" differential is to allow the board to
remove members without fear of breaking Florida law, rather than some
Hera is an awesome person. So happy to see her doing well!
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 at 22:56 Richard Symonds <
> I thought it would be helpful to share with you all this blog post from a
> key volunteer at Wikimania 2014, who has gone on to
My argument to that is that eventually we'd be in the situation where no
bids are viable. The proposed rotation system would hopefully provide
enough prep time to alleviate that.
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 at 16:07 Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 October 2015 at 22:54, J
> > > >
> > > > > A small poll on meta would be enough.
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: josephfoxw...@gmail.com
> > > > > > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 19:14:59 +
> > > > > > To: wikim
If you want the views of everyone on every project... then yes, I do.
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 20:14 MF-Warburg <mfwarb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Do you really believe the community consists of several 100.000 people?
> Am 06.10.2015 21:01 schrieb "Joseph Fox" &l
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 17:27 Steinsplitter Wiki
> To be honest: I am not surprised at all.
> Wikimedia Foundation is becoming moor and moor centralized. They no longer
> care about the community, even if there is huge community consensus about
I think these wikis have been on that list for a while. I don't know the
specifics of why they're there, though, or comment on the depth/quality of
the articles on the wikis.
On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 at 22:32 Salvador A salvador1...@gmail.com wrote:
I just I noticed that Cebuano and
Mail list logo