On 01/30/2016 07:19 AM, Risker wrote:
> While we're at it...diversity remains a very serious problem for the
> Board. Does the community voting process want to try to take that on? How
> would we do such a thing?
I wildly speculate that it could be done through a voter pledge,
sketched at
On 08/21/2014 07:17 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
It's very different futures -- a WMF that
exists purely to do what communities ask it to, or a WMF that exists -
in part - to look forward, close gaps, and help anticipate where we
want to be 3, 5, 10 years from now. Irrespective of what my own take
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I cannot cite anything, but there should be studies that show that even
though most people are bilingual or reported as bilingual in their
regional language and another major language, they are more
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:14 AM, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This is inserting a conspiracy theory where one does not exist.
The English Wikipedia community voted on the blackout and directed it
into existence, not the Foundation. We merely
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:38 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/08/2012 16:24, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:14 AM, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk
wrote:
The proposal was floated by Jimmy Wales on the 10th of december, 1
day after a Creative Commons Board meeting
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:31 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2012 13:09, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
So, is the time ripe yet for us to start pushing for a 14-year term,
or do we wait a bit? I suggest we start contemplating it, however.
The most pirated bit of content at
, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Mike Linksvayer m...@gondwanaland.com
wrote:
0 years best, but I think some unauthorized sharing data could support
a merely shorter term
Mike - you mean you think all CC licenses should converge to CC0 immediately?
No, that wouldn't be effective. There are different
