I think there is fair reason to raise questions about the benefit of paywalled
sources, despite my optimism about the partnerships. I don't totally share the
concerns, but they are surely worth addressing:
First off, we are not handled any ideal choices here. Either our editors do
not have
A few additional thoughts:
This is not just a problem with paywalled sources, but *any* source which is
not available free *and* online. Not all of the sources that have been donated
are solely pay-for-access; some of them, for example, you would just need a
good university library reference
Heather,
Thanks for a fascinating read. You managed to capture the crazy, chaotic,
collaborative world we sometimes inhabit, especially during events like the
Egyptian Revolution. In all, it was a truly fascinating and consuming event to
be a part of, and it got me briefly hooked on the rush
*sorry, my last response was so full of confusing errors I've rewritten it*
Heather,
Thanks for a fascinating read. You managed to capture the crazy, chaotic,
collaborative world we sometimes inhabit, especially during events like the
Egyptian Revolution. In all, it was a truly fascinating
The quest for get Wikipedia editors the sources they need is gaining momentum.
Here's what's happening and what you can sign up for ''right now'':
* '''[[WP:Credo|Credo Reference]]''' provides full-text online versions of
nearly 1200 published reference works from more than 70 publishers in
Hi folks!
Two Community Fellowship Proposals you might be interested in:
The Wikipedia Adventure is a dynamic, interactive learning game about how to
use Wikipedia
(http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Fellowships/Project_Ideas/The_Wikipedia_Adventure).
The Wikipedia Library is a