+1 — this is super cool! Congrats to all involved.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:33 PM Samuel Klein wrote:
> This is the best. Thank you for persisting it making it not just useful
> but fantastic. :)
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 12:10 PM Sam Walton wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> We've just published a
Gnangarra admitted to deliberately using a provocative tone to get
attention ("I chose my tone intentionally to draw attention to the
competition"). Acting surprised that people were aggrieved is disingenuous.
On the topic of sexism: the underrepresentation in the Wikimedia community
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Tim Starling
> On 22/02/16 18:45, Erik Moeller wrote:
> > The numbers for "very active editors" appear to have stabilized at a
> > slightly higher level than previously. I can't find any firm
> > conclusion on what has caused this
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak
> There is way too much blaming/bashing/sour expectations
> working both ways - we almost forget how unique we are, irrespective of
> many slips and avoidable failures we make (and WMF is definitely leading
This is the first monthly report from the Wikimedia Performance Team.
of these reports is to showcase our work, track our progress, and spark
## Who we are ##
As the Wikimedia Foundation’s Performance Team, we want to create
value for readers
and editors by
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <bjor...@wikimedia.org
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ori Livneh <o...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > Improving future-proof maintainability by taking thumbnail code out of
> > MediaWiki-Core and usin
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a break from thinking about things going wrong. And so per Milos'
observation that discussion here is falling off, I thought I'd start an
open discussion thread about things going right.
What's a cool thing you
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Keegan Peterzell kpeterz...@wikimedia.org
This is now complete . That wasn't too bad.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:55 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
The banners may be effective, but they're not aligned with Wikimedia's
I wouldn't come out quite as strongly against these banners, but I share
the underlying sentiment.
I agree that the urgency and alarm of the
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Anders Wennersten
I experienced no improved answer time, but all time stamps in Wikipedia
for me become wrong making it impossible to use the feature. I would call
this problem a thing that should have been found in an alpha
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se
Thanks!, glad you could sort this out and file a bug
But really, I understand from this that this feature was released as a
Beta feature without it ever been tried out on any other project then enwp,
(apologies for cross-posting)
I'm happy to announce that HHVM is available on all Wikimedia wikis for
intrepid beta testers. HHVM, you'll recall, is an alternative runtime for
PHP that provides substantial performance improvements over the standard
PHP interpreter. Simply put: HHVM is software
Mail list logo