I would like to not limit the discussion to interwiki links; it also
applies to Wikipedia infoboxes and Wiktionary tables, for example.
On Thu, 17 May 2018 at 20:55 Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rob Speer wrote:
> > The result of this, by the way, is that comm
to copyright is predatory in two ways. It is how can we get
> around existing copyright and how can we protect our own. As argued,
> Wikidata shines when it is used for what it is intended to be; the place
> that brings data, of Wikipedias first and elsewhere second, together to be
> used as a reposi
Wow, thanks for the heads up. When I was getting upset about projects that
change the license on Wikimedia content and commercialize it, I had no idea
that Wikidata was providing them the cover to do so. The Creative Commons
violation is coming from inside the house!
On Tue, 8 May 2018 at 03:48
Right, this worries me too.
I know that Wikimedia doesn't enforce the copyright on the content
themselves, because they don't hold the relevant copyrights, the authors
do. But there seems to be no guidance for what _anyone_ can do to address
and correct large-scale violations. The guides on
t; The same is also true for Everipedia, BTW.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> > On 10 Apr 2018, at 14:43, Rob Speer <rob.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > BabelNet (http://babelnet.org) is a multilingual knowledge resource that
> > defines words and phrases in many langu
C-By-SA license that it should be under.
I'm sure Wikimedia has dealt with similar situations to this. What would be
the most effective next step to ensure that BabelNet follows the CC-By-SA
license?
-- Rob Speer
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
Systemic bias issues on Wikipedia are often exacerbated by the lack of
digital resources in certain subject areas. (Another reason for this
librarian to get annoyed when people say everything is online.) The
book grant program is a great way to help address this.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at
d "content" the same
one that I'm trying to draw between "content format" and "content access"?
I have further thoughts on this, but I just want to make sure we're talking
about the same distinction.
Rob
___
> , Penguin
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/?banner=B1516_0916_en6C_dsk_p1_lg_pngsml=1=US>
> Thank
> you for pointing this out to us.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Lisa
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Rob <gamali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't think
I don't think this rises to the level of outrage, but it's a little
important. The goal of the WMF should be to promote free and open
content, and this adds to the perception that the WMF is disconnected
from those goals and the community. I don't care if they use a stock
photo if they need to,
I doubt the selection of a single image occupied that much staff time
and discussion. No process is perfect. This is a small thing, that
was quickly fixed. I doubt a lot of money was wasted here.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:11 PM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
> "On Fri, Dec 4,
That male librarian here.
I think we need to encourage people to add more and conflicting data
to Wikidata, and to cite their sources when they do so. Currently
it's not particularly easy to cite your sources on Wikidata. So the
end result is that it encourages people to view whatever single
recommend structuring the conversation (and figure out
action items) to achieve your imagined goal.
Rob
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Gilles Dubuc <gil...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> As part of T113210 [1], which is a broader discussion on track for the
> developer summit, I am hosti
Andrew Lih recorded our panel "Journalism and the Online Information
Community", but I'm not sure when/if that video will make it to the web.
I can't speak for the organizers, but it is my understanding that Gregory
Kohs was banned under the Safe Space policy, not because he was a critic.
Critics
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-03-25/News_and_notes
Op-ed: How my father's railroad image collection now
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-03-25/News_and_notes
Op-ed: How my father's railroad image collection now
Fantastic! Any idea if they will be recording book II of the Clavier as
well?
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:39:52 +0200
Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hi,
Plenty of things like this happen in the
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 10 – 11 March 2015
Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-03-11/Special_report
In focus: WMF to NSA: stop spying on Wikipedia users
definitively state that this question of supporting MP4 has not
been determined. We will not support MP4 without community consensus.
Rob
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
be happy to answer general questions you have about the
program as well.
Please refer to the information at the bottom of this email for instructions on
how to join.
Thank you,
Rob Schnautz
Online Communications Contractor
Global Development
Wikimedia Foundation
From: Rob Schnautz
Sent: Tuesday, 12
are unable to attend, a link to the chat log will be posted at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours for public viewing following
the session.
Details on how to join the session are included below. We look forward to
chatting with you!
Rob Schnautz
Online Communications Contractor
21 matches
Mail list logo