Re: [Wikimedia-l] CheckUser openness

2012-06-15 Thread Stephanie Daugherty
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote: Two points that might help bring people on different sides of the issue closer together. 1. How about notifying people that they have been check-usered 2 months after the fact? By that time I hope all

Re: [Wikimedia-l] CheckUser openness

2012-06-15 Thread Stephanie Daugherty
Am I correct to summorise here than that CU works because people don't know it doesn't? Almost. It works because people don't know how, don't care how, or don't think they are attracting enough attention to avoid being targeted. ___ Wikimedia-l

Re: [Wikimedia-l] CheckUser openness

2012-06-14 Thread Stephanie Daugherty
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:36 AM, David Richfield davidrichfi...@gmail.comwrote: So User:mfgaowener should get an automated mail saying because you did a pagemove with edit summary Haers! you were checkusered. Please be more subtle in your vandalism next time. I trust the current checks

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Watchlist email notifications enabled on all wikis

2012-04-27 Thread Stephanie Daugherty
Automatically adjusting the email frequency might be a worthwhile feature to strive for: If an editor hasn't logged in within the past 30 days, revert to monthly digest, that way we don't drive editors away with the email frequency. -Stephanie On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:07 PM, John Vandenberg