ell it
> should be, given the pure unadulterated trash that tends to come in
> whenever a Tor exit node is missed in the routine lockdowns.
Risker, example of "pure unadulterated trash" edits on Wikipedia, or are we
just to take your word for it?
You know,
ven't done anything bad is done by
administrative hall monitors with too much time on their hands for no good
reason?
I am grateful though that John pledges solemnly to observe WP:BEANS.
Trillium Corsage
05.06.2017, 18:44, "David Gerard" <dger...@gmail.com>:
> Editing may be a tric
hat he may be
confident it was not merely a "conversations I "say" I have had."
It is accurate though that I erred by recalling that the list moderator
suggested I was "trolling" when he actually used the word "baiting."
Trillium Corsage
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017
.
Trillium Corsage
29.07.2016, 22:26, "Ed Erhart" :
> I regret to inform everyone that Kevin Gorman, a Wikipedian who was the
> first Wikipedian-in-residence at a US university or college, has passed
> away. There is a memorial page on Facebook, and editors are leaving
> cond
in this nearly completely unaccountable
administrative system that attracts some of the worse kind of psychologies
imaginable.
Trillium Corsage
05.06.2016, 17:49, "Pine W" :
> Hi Pax and Pete,
>
> It sounds like part of the issue in this case may be that may we nee
f is modify and update the terms of service,
give advise to the board, coordinate with WMF Trust and Safety in the banning
of certain editors, and handle routine inquiries.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://m
r? If it's not possible to
selectively prohibit, how about an on/off switch, i.e. *no-one* may watchlist
an editor's individual talkpage.
Trillium Corsage
21.05.2016, 02:20, "Johan Jönsson" :
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Danny Horn <dh...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
dex.php?title=Cookie_statement=historysubmit=revision=105722=104960.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscrib
s secret HR stuff that
would embarrass Lila? It doesn't seem that way to me. There've been a dozen
news stories on her leaving, and none have reported it was on wonderful terms
all around. So what's the big deal?
Publish the minutes or say "there was no meeting, there are no
let it be known otherwise which trustee initiated (and which
seconded) (and which opposed if any) the call for the ED's resignation.
Trillium Corsage
16.04.2016, 02:23, "Risker" :
> I think they already have been - by Patricio's email and public posting
> stating that Lila tendered her re
er trustee should be criticized for violating any
confidence, after all Wikimedia prides itself on transparency.
Trillium Corsage
16.03.2016, 12:17, "Andreas Kolbe" :
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:13 AM, John Mark Vandenberg
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Sara
d decipher really is that
boardmember Samuel Klein raised the motion to remove the requirement.
Trillium Corsage
03.03.2016, 16:22, "Brion Vibber" :
> On Mar 3, 2016 8:19 AM, "Pete Forsyth" <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Enjoying this discussion, glad to see
Hang tough, Lila Tretikov. This will all pass. These people leaving blaming
you, bah! You are cleaning the WMF cupboard, and that's overdue. Don't let
anybody or anything psyche you out.
Trillium Corsage
19.02.2016, 21:31, "Wikipedia Signpost" :
> Special report: Searc
ties.
Horrendous I know and tends to shows that Arbcom and the rest of Enwiki
administrative structure genuinely have a problem with women, which they are
often alleged to (i.e. in Gamergate and all that).
Trillium Corsage
PS: A similar thing happened to editor Kiefer Wolfowitz. After seekin
perior.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
Not necessarily disbelieving you, but can you point to a single, concrete
example of a "paid editor replacing a deadlink with a link to the spam site
copied from waybackmachine?" I'd like to see w
should have a look at the seamier side of (at least) English
WIkipedia. There are people, particularly among the administrative set, with
null interest in articles but consumed with interpersonal conflict and
targeting of others. It's not a small problem
way more important than readers." Seems pretty brazen and non-inclusive to me,
and illustrative of the attitudes of the administrative set.
Trillium Corsage
02.12.2015, 16:36, "Todd Allen" :
> That's nice. Do you want me to explicitly say "Volunteers are more
>
s advocacy articles. Or if, like Bosch
Sensortec, they tended actually to be pretty good. Unfortunately the
Orangemoody investigation's team has decided they must remain unavailable to
the public, allegedly to protect the article subjects from repeat alleged
victimization.
Trillium Corsage
03.0
and other easterners just
trying to put food on the table for their kids.
Trillium Corsage
02.09.2015, 21:53, "Matt Campbell" :
> Glad to hear it.
>
> Original message
> From: James Heilman
> Date: 09/01/2015 10:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Wikimed
administrative
achievements or are some of the bad Wikipedia participants you have blocked?
Trillium Corsage
10.06.2015, 21:54, Todd Allen email clipped:
Well, let's not forget the big picture.
For all the bickering and squabbling it might have entailed, for all the
stumbles that might have happened
to all: the link provided doesn't contain a sexual image, though the image
under discussion must be.
Trillium Corsage
11.06.2015, 19:31, Trillium Corsage trillium2...@yandex.com:
Todd, since you credit yourself as a collaborative creator of a
world-historic educational work, what are some
unmoderated again.
Trillium Corsage
24.05.2015, 14:07, Ad Huikeshoven email clipped:
Hi all and Fae,
One, I'm not a moderator on this list. Two, I do support civility and
friendly space policies, Three, let's assume good faith, Four, Fae asks to
be unmoderated and or asks for a rationale
of a reason for its use. And this also would immensely
improve the ability to audit the logs.
13.04.2015, 01:56, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org:
On 13/04/15 00:12, Trillium Corsage wrote:
text clipped for brevity
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
.
BUT MY QUESTION NOW is: What is the status of the policy? For example English
Wikipedia just got three new checkusers: Bbb23, Callanecc, and Mike V. What
information were they required to provide? Proper documents, or merely an email
address and assertion that they are over 18?
Trillium
endorsed Beaudette's actions by changing the policy. I dunno
if he could similarly move the board on policy he's not intimately involved
with implementing, I'd say not.
Okay, then.
Trillium Corsage
12.04.2015, 17:20, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com:
Have you considered that you might get
-type stalking incidents more
frequent in the future.
Trillium Corsage
14.03.2015, 06:35, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com:
Hi Bishakha,
Pardon my forking the thread here.
I have previously asked about having more transparency and openness for WMF
Board meetings. From my skimming of Board minutes
the matter up before you moderate the guy?
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
data via
checkuser and UTRS and so forth to anonymous administrators is creating real
risks to Wikipedia editors, and that is the case I make in the open letter.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
One is a steward the other is an administrator, I may have reversed their
roles, but they are definitely the two that stalked Moiramoira.
Thanks for the notification, I'll doublecheck which is which and see about
correcting that.
Trillium Corsage
02.02.2015, 14:55, Hong, Yena li
it.
Trillium Corsage
PS: yes, I identify as male (he, his etc.).
02.02.2015, 15:03, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com:
I wasted the few minutes necessary to read Trillium's blog post, and I
don't recommend anyone else make that same mistake. He's taken a few
incidents in a 7 year period, presented them
Lfaraone, you're an English Wikipedia arbitrator only as far as I know. What
gives you the authority or expertise to make assertions about the legal
implications of WMF terms of use violations?
Are you a WMF employee?
Are you a lawyer?
Trillium Corsage
20.01.2015, 04:19, LFaraone wikipe
to do?
You seem to have misread what I said. In such a case, the WMF could advise the
editor of all that privately, say publicly because of privacy or legal
implications, we won't be specific, but we advised the individual privately,
and that would be reasonable as far as I'm concerned.
Trillium
intimidated, and clearly doesn't, when a bunch of very loud people writes
volumes of complaining text on discussion pages insisting that he has affronted
the community.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
it. We will
Streisand you.
Trillium Corsage
06.08.2014, 16:11, Nathan email clipped:
Thanks very much for this, Stephen and the legal team. I especially
appreciate that the WMF has decided to make public the specific
notifications of the use of the Right to be forgotten in the EU.[1] It's
, but I'll keep
reading long enough to see if your below email asking for transparency on the
list goes anywhere. Good luck.
Trillium Corsage
11.07.2014, 11:28, Fæ fae...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I would like to propose that this list have a published process for
post moderation, banning and appeals
general
counsel Luis Villa. I've attempted to answer those by explaining that you can
have a pretty good and effective policy without having an infallible one.
Trillium Corsage
29.06.2014, 07:32, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com:
Trillium,
I am having difficulty understanding how retaining copies
and unaccountable administrative
participants.
Trillium Corsage
27.06.2014, 01:48, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org:
Hi, Trillium-
As I pointed out to you the last time we discussed the privacy
policy[1], this issue (and the rest of the policy) were discussed
extensively with the community
potentially has some recourse if it finally comes to it. So I say the
usefulness there is treating editors right and furnishing a safer environment
for them, in which they are not so exposed to anonymous administrators.
Thank you for your response.
Trillium Corsage (by the way although
with potentially cyberstalker
tools.
Whatever your stance, I do call on you to speak on the question. Say yea, say
nay, or say not my concern, but at least speak.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki
on it by those who most
understand it, like the general counsel Geoff Brigham.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
Dear Mr. Brigham,
Excuse me, I should have copied you in the email I sent to the Wikimedia-l list
I sent a few minutes ago, because I mentioned you in it. Here:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-June/072499.html.
Trillium Corsage
it accords access to the
personal-identifiable information of editors. They're going to behave better if
they know they can be held accountable for their actions.
Trillium Corsage
05.06.2014, 18:34, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org:
Hi, Trillium and others
of those that
sign their real name to everything, and endeavor to consider that in any
interaction I have with you.
Signature: well let me see how my nickname shows up on the list. I selected
Trillium Corsage as the name at the email service, but I typed Cloaked
Citizen when I registered
43 matches
Mail list logo