Re: [Wikimedia-l] Responses to en-wp sourcing question

y makes the list... I'll have a look at the research mailing list once I've finished exploring Adam's suggestion, Pine.   Thanks to the three of you for taking the time to respond! sashi ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wi

[Wikimedia-l] Wikipedia's sourcing

), right? Thanks for any corrections / suggestions,   sashi ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l

[Wikimedia-l] Category: French Jews on en.wp / GDPR

t because I think some quick thinking and corrective action is needed.   sashi ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wi

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Category: French Jews on en.wp / GPDR

that membership in the category would not be diffused concerning living people in countries where such lists are illegal? (As Yaroslav points out, there is no guarantee of the quality of the sourcing).  En.wp might be wise to learn from the conservative approach to this question taken by fr.wp

[Wikimedia-l] Category: French Jews on en.wp / GPDR

rrent policies on English Wikipedia actively facilitate violation of French laws. (data from petscan.wmflabs.org): French Christians (21 members), French Hindus (17 members), French Buddhists (9 members), French Muslims (0 members), French Jews (862 members). Thank you for your time cons