On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Rjd0060 wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Nathan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back to doing
> > > whatever they feel is actually important.
> >
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Nathan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back to doing
> > whatever they feel is actually important.
> >
> > Let it go. It really does not matter. AT ALL.
> >
> >
> I
To me, the only thing at stake is the seriousness of this list - and that
is not a new issue, unfortunately.
Regards,
Thyge /Sir48
2014-08-01 21:59 GMT+02:00 Nathan :
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back t
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 wrote:
>
>
>
> No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back to doing
> whatever they feel is actually important.
>
> Let it go. It really does not matter. AT ALL.
>
>
I can't agree. It's clear that lives are at stake, not to mention our
in
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Russavia
wrote:
>
> > Jeez guys - stop beating the horse. It's never was alive to begin with.
>
> Rjd0060, I'm not sure here, but are you saying that the guy didn't
> actually donate the $20? If so, he publicly said he did, so it's best
> not to say such things wh
Alternately, we could stop feeding an obvious troll.
On 1 August 2014 20:30, Russavia wrote:
> Hi Richard, et al
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Richard Symonds
> wrote:
>> He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
>> through a friend. Very tricky to track down
2014-08-01 16:30 GMT-03:00 Russavia :
> Rjd0060, I'm not sure here, but are you saying that the guy didn't
> actually donate the $20? If so, he publicly said he did, so it's best
> not to say such things which could be misconstrued as you saying the
> guy lied. Perhaps contact with him via Twitte
Hi Richard, et al
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Richard Symonds
wrote:
> He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
> through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
True, people can and do donate via such methods. I did so myself when
I donated the half proceeds fro
+1, sorry, that was my point :-)
On 1 Aug 2014 20:10, "Rjd0060" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Richard Symonds <
> richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
> > through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
> >
The time a staff or contractor will need to discover his donation or if he
has donated is more expensive than 20 USD.
Ask him better donations, revert the vandalism and don't give the money
back, using it for some useful thing, like improving anti-vandalism tools.
2014-08-01 16:10 GMT-03:00 Rjd0
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Richard Symonds <
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
> through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
>
Or...the US NSA hacked into the Foundation's donor database and removed it
to con
He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
On 1 Aug 2014 17:42, "Dennis Pierri" wrote:
> ;O we get vandalized and he doesn't stick to his word of donating? Some
> people are just mean.
>
> On 01/08/2014, at 10:10, Lisa Gru
;O we get vandalized and he doesn't stick to his word of donating? Some people
are just mean.
On 01/08/2014, at 10:10, Lisa Gruwell wrote:
> We do not see any donations from anyone by that name.
>
> Best,
> Lisa Gruwell
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Russavia
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, A
We do not see any donations from anyone by that name.
Best,
Lisa Gruwell
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Russavia
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Newyorkbrad
> wrote:
> > The activity you describe is obviously unacceptable. However, the amount
> > of time and effort that out associ
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Newyorkbrad wrote:
> The activity you describe is obviously unacceptable. However, the amount
> of time and effort that out associated with tracking down and returning a
> particular $20 contribution would not be worth it.
>
> Newyorkbrad
Newyorkbrad, it wouldn't
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Russavia
wrote:
>
> To make matters a little worse, the US House of Representatives IP has
> taken to vandalising the Russian Wikipedia article for the Russian
> national anthem,[5] replacing sheet music for the anthem with the
> sheet music for Putin -- khuilo (
Was this paid-by-proxy contribution accompanied by disclosure?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/l
The activity you describe is obviously unacceptable. However, the amount
of time and effort that out associated with tracking down and returning a
particular $20 contribution would not be worth it.
Newyorkbrad
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Russavia
wrote:
> On 23 July John Resig tweeted a
On 23 July John Resig tweeted a challenge,[1]
"I will donate $20 to a charity if someone can land an edit to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilians or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory) … in
@congressedits"
Sure enough, someone took up Resig's challenge with this e
19 matches
Mail list logo
