Leslie Carr, 14/08/2013 22:30:
http://status.wikimedia.org is from external monitors
I don't see any annual or multi-year stats there and I don't think they
monitor readon-only vs. rw state.
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
2013/8/14 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org:
On 14/08/13 07:40, Oliver Keyes wrote:
We have weekend support - for core services, which constitute our MediaWiki
instances. Git, however, is not a core service - as Max accurately notes,
while it makes development finicky and frustrating,
I
Chris McKenna, 14/08/2013 00:00:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote:
I'd like to think Engineering do a pretty good job at uptime for core
services - when was the last time you saw Wikipedia down for any extended
period of time? - regardless of what day of the week it is.
Wikipedia
http://status.wikimedia.org is from external monitors
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse the brevity and typos.
On Aug 14, 2013 4:44 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris McKenna, 14/08/2013 00:00:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote:
I'd like to think Engineering do
We have weekend support - for core services, which constitute our MediaWiki
instances. Git, however, is not a core service - as Max accurately notes,
while it makes development finicky and frustrating, it doesn't impact on
our core mission, which is to provide the sum of human knowledge, for
A quick update I just sent to wikitech-l (where this conversation should
be happening):
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-August/071171.html
Full text below:
As you all are aware, git.wikimedia.org (powered by GitBlit) has been
unstable. The root cause is
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Oliver Keyes wrote:
I'd like to think Engineering do a pretty good job at uptime for core
services - when was the last time you saw Wikipedia down for any extended
period of time? - regardless of what day of the week it is.
Wikipedia uptime is certianly much better these
On 14/08/13 07:40, Oliver Keyes wrote:
We have weekend support - for core services, which constitute our MediaWiki
instances. Git, however, is not a core service - as Max accurately notes,
while it makes development finicky and frustrating,
I didn't know anyone used git.wikimedia.org. I think
I maintained 24/7 support with a team of 6. WMF has 150 staff and does
not have weekend support. The tail is wagging the dog.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Hello,
I always believed that our servers where monitored 24/7? But nobody seems
to be arround to fix a core part in our systems?
Huib
-- Forwarded message --
From: rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM
Subject: [Wikimania-l]
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I always believed that our servers where monitored 24/7? But nobody seems
to be arround to fix a core part in our systems?
Huib
-- Forwarded message --
From: rupert THURNER
Huib Laurens, 10/08/2013 17:31:
I always believed that our servers where monitored 24/7?
Not magically, despite the amount of unicorns bought by the WMF. You're
looking for https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51983
But nobody seems
to be arround to fix a core part in our
Huib Laurens wrote:
I always believed that our servers were monitored 24/7? But nobody seems
to be around to fix a core part in our systems?
Hi Huib.
You've been around quite a long time, so it shouldn't be new information
to you that the appropriate mailing list for an issue like this is
13 matches
Mail list logo
