I'm fine with people having some private discussions. The more formal
the discussion is, and the more public the implications of the
discussions are, then the more I think that the discussions should be
public with the exception of discussions involving information which
there is a strong reason
Hi,
The IRC channels where public, on-topic discussions are held usually have
public logging, like #wikimedia-office. And regardless of the channel,
discussions within them have no bearing on onwiki actions. In other words,
binding decisions cannot be made solely on IRC. That is very different
I don't like those either. I tend to ignore email unless there's a very
good reason for private communication. If not, well, post a message on my
talk page.
The recording is incomplete. A complete recording would be the raw video of
the session without cuts or edits, and with everyone there aware
Hi Todd,
I'm not sure how your comment about "backchanneling" is applicable to a
recording made in public. Please express your views in a good-faith and
respectful manner.
On Wikimedia projects, we do things in full public view.
To prove your point, please link to the log of the irc channels
Nicole,
While I appreciate you taking the time to respond, this is exactly why we
distrust this kind of backchanneling. If you have something to say, you say
it publicly, open to criticism and dispute. You don't say it in a "salon"
or a "survey" or anything else insulated from that. On Wikimedia
Hello again,
I now realised that none of the participants in the audience was aware
of us recording them, and that we aren't able to identify them to ask
for their consent. We are not going to release the full video, but are
of course happy to answer potential questions and create more clarity
Hello Todd,
Thanks for your question. The video is indeed incomplete. We cut if
for the viewer's comfort, as the original version is ~60 mins long,
and has questions and interaction with the audience at All Hands. Our
main objective for this video was to focus on conveying the broad
context and
Hello,
A brief note to say thanks to Mehrdad and Rupika for their support of
the January and/or February Wikimedia Café events. Also, thanks to
volunteers who have been involved in the strategy process for their
participation, thanks to User:Fuzheado for the one page summary of the
strategy
Hello Nicole,
The second video seems to be incomplete. There are, for example, several
jump cuts, e.g., at 05:07, 11:08, 17:08, 22:31, etc. At 11:14 the
presenters invite questions or comments, and at 41:32 someone is clearly
being called upon to offer one, but they are not shown in the video.
Thanks for this great plan of action or policy designed to achieve a major
or overall aim - regarding the sum of all knowledge. I enjoyed your podcast
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WP_72_-_Wikimedia_2030,_a_strategy_interview.mp3#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D
-
in particular. (Seems like
Hi everyone,
We’re in week 4 of community conversations about the movement strategy
recommendations. Thank you to everyone who has already taken part. The
community conversations will continue until Friday, February 21 - you
can get involved on Meta[1] in Arabic, English, French, German, Hindi,
11 matches
Mail list logo
