Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-27 Thread Tim Landscheidt
(anonymous) wrote: [...] Broadly, I don't think many people appreciate how important mailing lists have been and continue to be to Wikimedia. Both in terms of providing a(n) historical record and in terms of day-to-day workflow. It would not be a bad investment on the part of the Wikimedia

[Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandros Kosiaris
___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Huib Laurens
What the fuck are you doing? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris akosia...@wikimedia.org wrote: ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Peel
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 Thanks, Mike On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:32, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote: What the fuck are you doing? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris akosia...@wikimedia.org wrote:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Lodewijk
please hold your tongue and be civil. Even if you don't understand something. Thanks! (and thanks Mike for the link!) 2014-02-25 22:32 GMT+01:00 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com: What the fuck are you doing? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris akosia...@wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Nathan
So the lesson here is that list archives should not be messed with. I don't think that is news, I seem to remember hearing about the havoc potentially caused by selectively editing list archives many years ago and once in awhile ever since. ___

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread MZMcBride
Nathan wrote: So the lesson here is that list archives should not be messed with. Yes. A thousand times yes. I don't think that is news, I seem to remember hearing about the havoc potentially caused by selectively editing list archives many years ago and once in awhile ever since. It goes