Thank you so much for working on this timeline Molly. A beautiful
presentation of an ugly situation!
Peter
On 23 February 2016 at 07:06, GorillaWarfare <
gorillawarfarewikipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Theo10011 wrote:
>
> > Please consider (for
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Theo10011 wrote:
> Please consider (for later) either linking or making a wiki version for
> Meta. Thanks for making this effort.
>
I intend to make a Mediawiki-friendly version once real life is out of the
way.
– Molly (GorillaWarfare)
Good Job GW!
Please consider (for later) either linking or making a wiki version for
Meta. Thanks for making this effort.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> All the shit from mailinglists is missing. For the temperature aka the
> understanding of the
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> All the shit from mailinglists is missing. For the temperature aka the
> understanding of the developments it is certainly as potent as some of the
> departures.
>
Hi Gerard,
Quite a few of the entries refer
Hoi,
All the shit from mailinglists is missing. For the temperature aka the
understanding of the developments it is certainly as potent as some of the
departures.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 22 February 2016 at 13:20, GorillaWarfare <
gorillawarfarewikipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recent discussion of
Thank you! For providing context to those that don't have it, structure to
those who do, and evidence of our values of collaboration, openness, and
empiricism. Remarkable thing to accomplish with a timeline : )
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Todd Allen wrote:
> Yes,
Thank you all so much for your feedback! I've just gone through all the
suggestions that you've sent via emails, messages, IRCs, and pull requests
and am really thrilled with all the help. I believe I'm caught up (for
now!) with reading through all that I've received, and I've incorporated
many of
GorillaWarfare wrote:
>Recent discussion of the Knowledge Engine/Wikimedia Discovery project,
>issues with senior leadership, lack of transparency, and the like has been
>fairly well spread across several Wikimedia projects and mailing lists, as
>well as on Facebook, in the media, and in other
That's a great wrap-up - thanks Molly!
For something a bit different, here is an outsiders view. I found this on
reddit, posted by a user named Ken_Thomas (I don't know who this is, but it
seems to be someone vaguely aware of, but not heavily involved in, the
off-wiki side of things). I thought
minor correction - the ? in my reply was meant to be a period. I'll be
keeping an eye on this timeline and watch the events unfold.
*Steven Crossin*
*cro0...@gmail.com *
On 22 February 2016 at 23:37, Chris Keating
wrote:
> Yes - very handy -
Le 22/02/16 13:20, GorillaWarfare a écrit :
Recent discussion of the Knowledge Engine/Wikimedia Discovery project,
issues with senior leadership, lack of transparency, and the like has been
fairly well spread across several Wikimedia projects and mailing lists, as
well as on Facebook, in the
Yes - very handy - thanks GorillaWarfare!
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Steven Crossin wrote:
> Thank you Molly. This is indeed helpful?
>
> *Steven Crossin*
> *cro0...@gmail.com *
>
> On 22 February 2016 at 23:20, GorillaWarfare <
>
Thank you Molly. This is indeed helpful?
*Steven Crossin*
*cro0...@gmail.com *
On 22 February 2016 at 23:20, GorillaWarfare <
gorillawarfarewikipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recent discussion of the Knowledge Engine/Wikimedia Discovery project,
> issues with senior leadership,
Recent discussion of the Knowledge Engine/Wikimedia Discovery project,
issues with senior leadership, lack of transparency, and the like has been
fairly well spread across several Wikimedia projects and mailing lists, as
well as on Facebook, in the media, and in other venues.
I just published an
14 matches
Mail list logo