Hi all,
The naming poll for the Travel Guide site is now open. For the next 14
days, you may be eligible to vote for as many of the proposed names as you
wish. For full details on voting criteria and other process notes as to
how the name will be selected, please see the voting page at
On 22 August 2012 22:39, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
For those interested, a quick reminder:
The travel guide RFC will (soft) close in 1 hour, 17 minutes as of the
moment this mail is sent. (At 0:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC))
I see none of the issues raised were really addressed.
Another spam filled, little populated, project then.
*sigh*
Tom
On 23 August 2012 11:53, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
On 22 August 2012 22:39, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
For those interested, a quick
Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way to determine if many
of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely
be heavily read and edited.
As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of medical
articles on Wikipedia to travel articles. Yet the
And here's a very short note about the next steps:
The board is reviewing the RfC and its talk page over the next week.
We are going to share our thoughts with you soon on the RfC's talk
page. Please feel free to leave comments there, that's still possible
and will be read ;-)
Regards, Alice
On
A travel guide discussion will be taking place today at Wikimania during
lunch. Representatives from Wikivoyage and from the editor community of
WIkitravel will be hear to answer any questions. A request for comment is
ongoing http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Travel_Guide
--
Hi James, where exactly are we going to meet? Arne
Am 12.07.2012 07:54 schrieb James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com:
A travel guide discussion will be taking place today at Wikimania during
lunch. Representatives from Wikivoyage and from the editor community of
WIkitravel will be hear to answer any
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:41, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote:
What I think would be important to avoid is too much subjective information
from one individual; for example, where I to write about York, UK I would
recommend not going to the Jorvik centre (a main attraction)
We've mainly approached this issue encouraging the different groups of
travellers to add relevant content for their areas. We specifically try to
mix it all in, because we don't want to section anyone off. There was
considerable controversy back in 2005 or so about adding an LBGT section to
the
What I think would be important to avoid is too much subjective
information
from one individual; for example, where I to write about York, UK I would
recommend not going to the Jorvik centre (a main attraction) because I
thought it overpriced and boring.
Whilst my viewpoint on this
Just to highlight my earlier point about sourcing, the article on Florence
currently says:
Opera was invented in Florence.
This happens to be true - but I have no proof of it, and it may well simply
be the opinion of the original writer. Much of the rest of the historical
section is the same;
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Mark Jaroski mark.jaro...@gmail.com wrote:
We're under the impression that there are
other Wikimedia foundation projects which don't use NPOV, and so those of
us favouring approaching WMF have been able to argue that we wouldn't be
forced to use it. If that's
12 matches
Mail list logo
