On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Newyorkbrad newyorkb...@gmail.com wrote:
The activity you describe is obviously unacceptable. However, the amount
of time and effort that out associated with tracking down and returning a
particular $20 contribution would not be worth it.
Newyorkbrad
We do not see any donations from anyone by that name.
Best,
Lisa Gruwell
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Newyorkbrad newyorkb...@gmail.com
wrote:
The activity you describe is obviously unacceptable. However, the
He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
On 1 Aug 2014 17:42, Dennis Pierri dennis6...@gmail.com wrote:
;O we get vandalized and he doesn't stick to his word of donating? Some
people are just mean.
On 01/08/2014, at
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
Or...the US NSA hacked into the Foundation's donor database and removed it
to
The time a staff or contractor will need to discover his donation or if he
has donated is more expensive than 20 USD.
Ask him better donations, revert the vandalism and don't give the money
back, using it for some useful thing, like improving anti-vandalism tools.
2014-08-01 16:10 GMT-03:00
+1, sorry, that was my point :-)
On 1 Aug 2014 20:10, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
through a friend. Very tricky to
Hi Richard, et al
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a chapter, or
through a friend. Very tricky to track down.
True, people can and do donate via such methods. I did so myself when
2014-08-01 16:30 GMT-03:00 Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com:
Rjd0060, I'm not sure here, but are you saying that the guy didn't
actually donate the $20? If so, he publicly said he did, so it's best
not to say such things which could be misconstrued as you saying the
guy lied. Perhaps
Alternately, we could stop feeding an obvious troll.
On 1 August 2014 20:30, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard, et al
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
He may have donated under a pseudonym, or by cheque, or to a
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jeez guys - stop beating the horse. It's never was alive to begin with.
Rjd0060, I'm not sure here, but are you saying that the guy didn't
actually donate the $20? If so, he publicly said he did, so it's best
not
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back to doing
whatever they feel is actually important.
Let it go. It really does not matter. AT ALL.
I can't agree. It's clear that lives are at stake, not to
To me, the only thing at stake is the seriousness of this list - and that
is not a new issue, unfortunately.
Regards,
Thyge /Sir48
2014-08-01 21:59 GMT+02:00 Nathan nawr...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I'm saying this doesn't
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back to doing
whatever they feel is actually important.
Let it go. It really does not
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rjd0060 rjd0060.w...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I'm saying this doesn't matter and people should get back to doing
On 23 July John Resig tweeted a challenge,[1]
I will donate $20 to a charity if someone can land an edit to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptilians or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory) … in
@congressedits
Sure enough, someone took up Resig's challenge with this
The activity you describe is obviously unacceptable. However, the amount
of time and effort that out associated with tracking down and returning a
particular $20 contribution would not be worth it.
Newyorkbrad
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
Was this paid-by-proxy contribution accompanied by disclosure?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
To make matters a little worse, the US House of Representatives IP has
taken to vandalising the Russian Wikipedia article for the Russian
national anthem,[5] replacing sheet music for the anthem with the
sheet
18 matches
Mail list logo
