Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: Become a Digital object identifier (DOI) registarnt

2015-01-23 Thread Andrew Gray
That said, there was an attempt in 2013 to provide Memento support, which would (partially) mitigate this problem by using appropriate templates: http://mementoweb.org/wikipedia/ Of course, this would still be vulnerable to deleted images etc. And we weren't even thinking about Wikidata

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: Become a Digital object identifier (DOI) registarnt

2015-01-23 Thread Petr Kadlec
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote: The oldid. At the moment, I trust our long-term viability more than a 2014 web-archiving startup, even one with praiseworthy names attached ;-) Possibly an obvious remark: an oldid-based permalink gets you an old

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: Become a Digital object identifier (DOI) registarnt

2015-01-21 Thread Andrew Gray
The oldid. At the moment, I trust our long-term viability more than a 2014 web-archiving startup, even one with praiseworthy names attached ;-) (Foolish question: can oldids be reconstituted from dumps?) Andrew. On 21 January 2015 at 00:01, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: Become a Digital object identifier (DOI) registarnt

2015-01-21 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Andrew Gray, 21/01/2015 13:35: (Foolish question: can oldids be reconstituted from dumps?) Yes, grep any XML dump for revision to see yourself. However, the standard import doesn't preserve this information. Nemo ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list,