Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-27 Thread Asaf Bartov
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote: Asaf Bartov, 25/01/2014 03:12: Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after six months, which is about 0.4%. Is

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Asaf Bartov, 25/01/2014 03:12: Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after six months, which is about 0.4%. Is active editor retention a metric defined somewhere? It's not in

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread LiAnna Davis
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote: lianna, where did you get that number from? I want credit for this report to go where it belongs -- the Program Evaluation team! I'm just assisting with publishing and distributing the report; the work in it is a

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread rupert THURNER
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis lda...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote: lianna, where did you get that number from? I want credit for this report to go where it belongs -- the Program Evaluation team! I'm

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread Strainu
2014-01-25 rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis lda...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote: lianna, where did you get that number from? I want credit for this report to go

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread Jaime Anstee
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote: Asaf Bartov, 25/01/2014 03:12: Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after six months, which is about 0.4%. Is

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread Jaime Anstee
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-01-25 rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis lda...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote: lianna,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Hi Jaime. Your inline replying format highly confuses me, but I tried to reconstruct what you meant to say and I believe it's what below. Jaime Anstee, 25/01/2014 20:19: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) Is active editor retention a metric defined somewhere? It's not in

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 Thread Jaime Anstee
Hello Nemo, Sorry for the confusing in-line, I entered the conversation late, and appreciate your patience. I do not think I am understanding what definition information you are asking for. The definition of how we defined the windows for 3 and 6 month follow-up is written on the overview page

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-24 Thread Asaf Bartov
Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after six months, which is about 0.4%. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/Library/WLM#New_users That (along with the easy-to-measure and