On 24 February 2015 at 09:19, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Maggie Dennis wrote:
You could be on to something there, Craig. :) I think it's fair to say
that somebody might change his mind in five years for all kinds of
reasons - including being asked nicely. This process is obviously
On 24 February 2015 at 01:25, ido ivri idoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Today, we're kicking-off a two-week community consultation about the future
of Wikimedia.
Why only these two questions? And why only two weeks? I fear this is not
really a consultation but a survey.
+1. With a two week window
Maggie Dennis wrote:
You could be on to something there, Craig. :) I think it's fair to say
that somebody might change his mind in five years for all kinds of
reasons - including being asked nicely. This process is obviously geared
to differ widely from the last. Hopefully it will be a good
I largely agree with Risker.
I was not involved in the last consultation. I'm taking a wait and see
approach with this one.
My hard-earned experience on this mailing list is that an approach of
problem solving rather than stone throwing tends to get more cooperation
and better results. I still
On 24 February 2015 at 09:40, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Philippe Beaudette wrote:
Five years ago, I was part of the work on a strategic plan for the
Wikimedia movement. Much has changed since then. Now, I’m back...and
we’re working on strategic direction again. :-)
Hi.
I
I think it is great that this is organised this way. To me it sounds a good
idea to have periodical this kind of consultations. It is a dialogue with
the community.
Romaine
2015-02-24 1:56 GMT+01:00 Maggie Dennis mden...@wikimedia.org:
You could be on to something there, Craig. :) I think it's
You could be on to something there, Craig. :) I think it's fair to say that
somebody might change his mind in five years for all kinds of reasons -
including being asked nicely. This process is obviously geared to differ
widely from the last. Hopefully it will be a good approach for everyone.
In
