Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Wikimedia Foundation Quarterly Report, October-December 2014

2015-02-19 Thread Tilman Bayer
Thanks, Alice!
The Participation and Content sections in the scorecard already
link to pages where further details on the definition of each metric
can be found, so I take your comment as a vote to include more of that
in the slide itself next time.
Articles means Wikipedia articles.
Page Views refers to all projects, just like in the previous Data
and Trends of the monthly reports - but now focusing on human traffic
only, like the slide says (Crawlers excluded).

(For those interested in the full gory details, see
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89024 )

As the beta indicates, we may still revisit the selection of metrics
in the next quarterly report.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Alice Wiegand me.ly...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Tilman,

 I like the focussed view and the compact information. On slide 4, the beta
 scorecard, it would be helpful to know and see (especially for further
 usage) which projects are base for the numbers.

 Alice.

 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi all,

 As Erik announced in November [1], the Foundation has changed its
 reporting from the monthly cycle that has been in place since 2008 to
 a quarterly rhythm. A main reason being to better align it with the
 quarterly planning and goalsetting process that has been extended to
 the entire organization since Lila took the helm. The first of these
 new quarterly reports has now been published here, in the format of a
 slide deck suitable for a 90 minute presentation:


 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Foundation_Quarterly_Report,_FY_2014-15_Q2_(October-December).pdf

 As discussed before [2], the main objectives and design principles for
 this report were:

 * Accountability: Help our movement and our supporters understand how
 we spend our effort, and what we accomplish.
 * Learning together: Highlight important internal  external data,
 trends and lessons.
 * Presentable: Anyone, from volunteer to the executive director,
 should be able to present the work of the WMF using this report.
 * Reasonable effort: Pull as much as possible from existing sources,
 e.g., quarterly review slide decks  minutes.

 Please refer to the linked PDF for the full report (I will see to
 provide a wiki version on Meta in the next few days, exploring the
 best technical process for this kind of conversion). But to offer an
 excerpt from the “Key insights and trends” part (slide 5):

 --
 * Readership: Globally, pageviews are flat. Mobile is growing, desktop
 is shrinking. Given a growing global potential audience, this means we
 need to invest in the readership experience, with focus on mobile.
  We have learned that we can move at highest velocity on mobile apps
 due to their self-contained nature.
 * Beyond editing:  Inviting readers to perform classification tasks on
 their smartphone is showing promise; response quality is exceeding
 expectations.
 * Performance: The implementation of HHVM across Wikimedia sites is an
 engineering success story and demonstrates that dedicated focus in the
 area of site performance can pay off relatively quickly.
 * Fundraising: Mobile matters -- thanks to focused effort, we were
 able to increase the mobile revenue share from 1.7% to 16.1% (2013 vs.
 2014 year-end campaign).
 --

 Be aware that in the interest of readability, the report focuses on
 the work done on a number of key priorities rather than attempting a
 comprehensive list of every team’s goals - for a more detailed view,
 consider referring to the documentation of that team’s quarterly
 reviews [3]. This being the first report in this new format, we will
 surely tweak format, content (including the choice of key metrics) and
 process for the subsequent issues. Comments continue to be welcome at
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_reports .


 Regards, Tilman


 [1]
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2014-November/001005.html
 [2]
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2015-February/076747.html
 [3]
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews


 --
 Tilman Bayer
 Senior Analyst
 Wikimedia Foundation
 IRC (Freenode): HaeB

 ___
 Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately
 directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia
 community. For more information about Wikimedia-l:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
 ___
 WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
 wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l

 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Wikimedia Foundation Quarterly Report, October-December 2014

2015-02-19 Thread Alice Wiegand
Hi Tilman,

I like the focussed view and the compact information. On slide 4, the beta
scorecard, it would be helpful to know and see (especially for further
usage) which projects are base for the numbers.

Alice.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi all,

 As Erik announced in November [1], the Foundation has changed its
 reporting from the monthly cycle that has been in place since 2008 to
 a quarterly rhythm. A main reason being to better align it with the
 quarterly planning and goalsetting process that has been extended to
 the entire organization since Lila took the helm. The first of these
 new quarterly reports has now been published here, in the format of a
 slide deck suitable for a 90 minute presentation:


 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Foundation_Quarterly_Report,_FY_2014-15_Q2_(October-December).pdf

 As discussed before [2], the main objectives and design principles for
 this report were:

 * Accountability: Help our movement and our supporters understand how
 we spend our effort, and what we accomplish.
 * Learning together: Highlight important internal  external data,
 trends and lessons.
 * Presentable: Anyone, from volunteer to the executive director,
 should be able to present the work of the WMF using this report.
 * Reasonable effort: Pull as much as possible from existing sources,
 e.g., quarterly review slide decks  minutes.

 Please refer to the linked PDF for the full report (I will see to
 provide a wiki version on Meta in the next few days, exploring the
 best technical process for this kind of conversion). But to offer an
 excerpt from the “Key insights and trends” part (slide 5):

 --
 * Readership: Globally, pageviews are flat. Mobile is growing, desktop
 is shrinking. Given a growing global potential audience, this means we
 need to invest in the readership experience, with focus on mobile.
  We have learned that we can move at highest velocity on mobile apps
 due to their self-contained nature.
 * Beyond editing:  Inviting readers to perform classification tasks on
 their smartphone is showing promise; response quality is exceeding
 expectations.
 * Performance: The implementation of HHVM across Wikimedia sites is an
 engineering success story and demonstrates that dedicated focus in the
 area of site performance can pay off relatively quickly.
 * Fundraising: Mobile matters -- thanks to focused effort, we were
 able to increase the mobile revenue share from 1.7% to 16.1% (2013 vs.
 2014 year-end campaign).
 --

 Be aware that in the interest of readability, the report focuses on
 the work done on a number of key priorities rather than attempting a
 comprehensive list of every team’s goals - for a more detailed view,
 consider referring to the documentation of that team’s quarterly
 reviews [3]. This being the first report in this new format, we will
 surely tweak format, content (including the choice of key metrics) and
 process for the subsequent issues. Comments continue to be welcome at
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_reports .


 Regards, Tilman


 [1]
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2014-November/001005.html
 [2]
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2015-February/076747.html
 [3]
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews


 --
 Tilman Bayer
 Senior Analyst
 Wikimedia Foundation
 IRC (Freenode): HaeB

 ___
 Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately
 directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia
 community. For more information about Wikimedia-l:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
 ___
 WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
 wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Wikimedia Foundation Quarterly Report, October-December 2014

2015-02-15 Thread Tilman Bayer
Hi all,

As Erik announced in November [1], the Foundation has changed its
reporting from the monthly cycle that has been in place since 2008 to
a quarterly rhythm. A main reason being to better align it with the
quarterly planning and goalsetting process that has been extended to
the entire organization since Lila took the helm. The first of these
new quarterly reports has now been published here, in the format of a
slide deck suitable for a 90 minute presentation:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia_Foundation_Quarterly_Report,_FY_2014-15_Q2_(October-December).pdf

As discussed before [2], the main objectives and design principles for
this report were:

* Accountability: Help our movement and our supporters understand how
we spend our effort, and what we accomplish.
* Learning together: Highlight important internal  external data,
trends and lessons.
* Presentable: Anyone, from volunteer to the executive director,
should be able to present the work of the WMF using this report.
* Reasonable effort: Pull as much as possible from existing sources,
e.g., quarterly review slide decks  minutes.

Please refer to the linked PDF for the full report (I will see to
provide a wiki version on Meta in the next few days, exploring the
best technical process for this kind of conversion). But to offer an
excerpt from the “Key insights and trends” part (slide 5):

--
* Readership: Globally, pageviews are flat. Mobile is growing, desktop
is shrinking. Given a growing global potential audience, this means we
need to invest in the readership experience, with focus on mobile.
 We have learned that we can move at highest velocity on mobile apps
due to their self-contained nature.
* Beyond editing:  Inviting readers to perform classification tasks on
their smartphone is showing promise; response quality is exceeding
expectations.
* Performance: The implementation of HHVM across Wikimedia sites is an
engineering success story and demonstrates that dedicated focus in the
area of site performance can pay off relatively quickly.
* Fundraising: Mobile matters -- thanks to focused effort, we were
able to increase the mobile revenue share from 1.7% to 16.1% (2013 vs.
2014 year-end campaign).
--

Be aware that in the interest of readability, the report focuses on
the work done on a number of key priorities rather than attempting a
comprehensive list of every team’s goals - for a more detailed view,
consider referring to the documentation of that team’s quarterly
reviews [3]. This being the first report in this new format, we will
surely tweak format, content (including the choice of key metrics) and
process for the subsequent issues. Comments continue to be welcome at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_reports .


Regards, Tilman


[1] 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2014-November/001005.html
[2] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2015-February/076747.html
[3] 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews


-- 
Tilman Bayer
Senior Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

___
Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed 
to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more 
information about Wikimedia-l:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
___
WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe