On Aug 11, 2014 7:11 AM, "Kim Bruning" <k...@bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > Ha, you'd think so! ;-) > > In reality so far, the only known application was to lock the common.js > at de.wikipedia, to prevent some crazy admin(s) from breaking the wiki. > > > Which incidentally shows that "will not break the wiki" really IS the > minimal admin criterion, and is not trivial at all }:-) > > sincerely, > Kim > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:19:27PM +1000, K. Peachey wrote: > > Lets all welcome the new overlord Erik. > > > > Add a new protection level called "superprotect" > > Assigned to nobody by default. Requested by Erik M??ller for the purposes > > of protecting pages such that sysop permissions are not sufficient to > > > > > > edit them. > > Change-Id: Idfa211257dbacc7623d42393257de1525ff01e9e > > < https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#q,Idfa211257dbacc7623d42393257de1525ff01e9e,n,z > > > > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/153302/ > > > > > > > > Someone clearly can't take criticism of their projects well. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
No one "broke the wiki" by disabling unwanted functions following a clear consensus. True breaking changes to those pages would be reverted by other admins before you could blink. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
