I can't speak for your second question, but on the first: have you used
Wordpress? The interface is fairly intuitive and obfuscates many of the
ways to make the site go kablooey - not all, but many. As someone who has
been an admin on their own Wordpress install for years (something that is
true
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2013 15:40, Matthew Roth mr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm not the right person to say it categorically, but as far as I'm aware,
there haven't been any non-staff Admin level users on the blog, at least
for some
It had volunteer administrators untill 6 months ago.
Huib
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:46 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote:
While i fully understand that contents on a domain called
wikimediafoundation should be foundation managed (i see your point though
that a notification
Hi Huib,
we are currently reorganizing the internal communication about the
Foundation's blog, and in the process have just removed your subscription.
The list is going to see more confidential information in the future, and
we want to focus membership more on people who need to know it. I want
Huib: Was that the blog mailing list? I'm not actually sure that's in use
at all anymore (I was never on it, I just assumed the discussions basically
just moved to comcom).
James Alexander
Manager, Merchandise
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:47 AM,
It was the explanation for both, I have some more communication:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org
Date: Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: Error on Blog while moderating
To: Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com
I can, but I'll be
Hi Huib,
thanks for correcting your earlier claim in the main thread that you
were never notified about this kind of thing (although unfortunately
this correction comes only after your claim already contributed to
leaving MZ a little speechless and feeling more and more ...
distanced from
On 13 May 2013 12:00, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
...
Curiously, here you left out one sentence from my 2011 email:
And while I don't want to pass judgment over your work on the
projects, the fact that you are currently blocked on Meta etc. makes
it difficult to justify keeping
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Tillman,
For the record, the time between your e-mail and my request why the rights
where removed is FOUR days.
That's a completely wrong statement. I emailed you as soon as I
removed you from the wikimedia-blog list.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2013 12:00, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
...
Curiously, here you left out one sentence from my 2011 email:
And while I don't want to pass judgment over your work on the
projects, the fact that you are
On 13 May 2013 12:42, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
By the way, I am unclear, was the email you are quoting extensively
from, rather than summarizing, a public correspondence, or are you
choosing to publish it now, on a permanently and publicly archived
email list, two year later?
All other things aside, misspelling the person's name and then calling them
an asshole is hardly likely to lead to an amicable solution, peace, love,
or understanding, is it?
On 13 May 2013 21:09, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Tillman,
For the record, the time between your e-mail
I see I do have the timeframe wrong with the e-mails. Sorry for that, that
means I need to look up to other e-mails and send with Jay also. So far I
will stand by my claim. I just had the wrong e-mails. But now you are
saying you removed me 4 months after the RFC you removed me from the blog
and
Given that the deadline for the list moderators passed several days
ago, may be could voluntarily stop at this point with the thread and not
really try to figure out whether moderators are needed?
Cheers
Yaroslav
On 13.05.2013 13:57, Huib Laurens wrote:
I take the asshole back. Sorry for
On 13 May 2013 12:54, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
All other things aside, misspelling the person's name and then calling them
an asshole is hardly likely to lead to an amicable solution, peace, love,
or understanding, is it?
That's correct. However I think we all recognize,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Thehelpfulone
thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote:
What I struggle to understand is that the Foundation was consulting about
methods of making the blog more open which was intended, from what I
understand, to allow more community members to manage it.
I'm not
On 13 May 2013 12:00, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Actually, you were the only volunteer removed at that point in 2011 -
there were at least four volunteers who I think are still on the list.
As indicated in the part of my email that you chose to quietly
suppress, a main reason to
On 13 May 2013 13:02, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for clarifying why Huib had his blog access revoked Tilman. Please
could you clarify why Casey and Alex (who haven't been socking, at least
not to my knowledge!) had their access revoked without notification?
Ah I
Hello,
A strange thing about the conversation that was going on before it escalated
isn't addressed at all. Something is happening on Meta. The community takes
action and then a few months later everything is passed and the user is
unblocked and working happily again. But then *BOOM* a
While we are waiting, if Matthew could also check whether I still have my
access rights to the blog, if I do I would appreciate them being removed as
I do not need them.
On Monday, May 13, 2013, Thehelpfulone wrote:
On 13 May 2013 13:02, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote:
wow, what a weekend to go camping :)
I'll also reply to Casey and Alex on the other thread, but I was the one
who changed their user rights from Editor to Contributor, which in our
WordPress setup limits some of their abilities, like approving comments,
uploading files and editing posts written
On 13 May 2013 15:40, Matthew Roth mr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm not the right person to say it categorically, but as far as I'm aware,
there haven't been any non-staff Admin level users on the blog, at least
for some time (again, I've only been at the Foundation for two years and
I'm
Tilman,
But with that said there is still no answer in why did you wait untill 3
months after the RFC when I was deblocked before you removed the rights?
And did you talked with you're co-workers or even ur boss (Jay) about it?
Huib
___
Wikimedia-l
Tilman Bayer wrote:
thanks for correcting your earlier claim in the main thread that you
were never notified about this kind of thing (although unfortunately
this correction comes only after your claim already contributed to
leaving MZ a little speechless and feeling more and more ...
distanced
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Tomasz W. Kozlowski
tom...@twkozlowski.net wrote:
I'm not going to respond to all the points raised in your e-mail, Sue
(partially because most of them are just too general), so let me just
mentioned some of them.
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Sue Gardner
On 11 May 2013 19:45, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
i would have expected a movement blog behind this URL, appropriate
to the usage of the domain, but i am not sure if i am completely
misreading this?
Comcom has been actively seeking more contributions from people other
than
On 11.05.2013 21:26, David Gerard wrote:
On 11 May 2013 19:45, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
i would have expected a movement blog behind this URL, appropriate
to the usage of the domain, but i am not sure if i am completely
misreading this?
Comcom has been actively seeking
No, ComCom is the communications committee. It's made up of people who are
movement spokespeople/otherwise have an interest in communication, by my
understanding. That's obviously going to include Chapters people, but it's
not limited to it.
On 11 May 2013 21:03, Yaroslav M. Blanter
On 11 May 2013 13:03, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
At this point I am lost. Comcom is made of the representative of chapters,
right? (I just happen to know this because the representatives of the
Russian chapter there have hmm... complicated relations with the
communities of
On 11 May 2013 21:03, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
At this point I am lost. Comcom is made of the representative of chapters,
right? (I just happen to know this because the representatives of the
Russian chapter there have hmm... complicated relations with the communities
of
30 matches
Mail list logo
