On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Patricio Lorente
wrote:
> I think you should read again the original email. The word "proposed" is
> never used there. The fourth paragraph says:
>
> "For your reference, here is the updated 2013-2014 Round 1 proposal process
> schedule:", refering to the process s
Hi Milos!
I think you should read again the original email. The word "proposed" is
never used there. The fourth paragraph says:
"For your reference, here is the updated 2013-2014 Round 1 proposal process
schedule:", refering to the process schedule for actual proposals.
Perhaps you understood:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jan-Bart de Vreede
wrote:
> I am sorry I don't understand the remarks completely… can you tell me a
> little bit more about what you are referring to?
As not particularly interested in the topic, I read the first
paragraph or two of the emails related to FDC, ho
Hey Milos,
I am sorry I don't understand the remarks completely… can you tell me a little
bit more about what you are referring to?
Jan-Bart
On Apr 18, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> It would be very useful to express the current state of the FDC in emails
> like this one -- at the
It would be very useful to express the current state of the FDC in emails
like this one -- at the top of email.
For a couple of months I was mislead that FDC is actually working and that
Wikimedia entities should do a kind of action toward FDC if they want to
get funds.
Contrary to that, just if
Dear friends and colleagues,
We want to share with you information about the Letter of Intent process
and the FDC schedule for next year (July 2013 - June 2014). As you may
remember, the *Letter of Intent (LoI)* is the first step towards applying
for funds from the FDC, as discussed in the FDC fra
