I agree that mass removal of photos depicting full-nudity statues (and in
some cases erotic scenes, including intercourse) or paintings of
undisputed historical significance would be more harmful than useful and
our policy should be inclusive of such material.
Given the different
I liked Facebooks' careful definition of what constitutes nudity.
Though their new policy would allow for diagrams of genitals for
medical education, it would be tough for Commons to adopt similar
anti-nudity laws without deleting a lot of historical and culturally
relevant photographs, plus all
On 19 Mar 2016 13:47, "Toby Dollmann" wrote:
> Much of it is relevant for WM Commons.
How so? Commons has a very different purpose to Facebook.
Facebook has updated its "community standards" for its 1.4 billion
users. Much of it is relevant for WM Commons.
"It's a challenge to maintain one set of standards that meets the
needs of a diverse global community," said Monika Bickert, Facebook's
head of global policy management, and Chris