Re: [Wikimedia-l] Facebook updates "community standards" for a "diverse global community"

2016-03-21 Thread Kalliope Tsouroupidou
I agree that mass removal of photos depicting full-nudity statues (and in some cases erotic scenes, including intercourse[1]) or paintings of undisputed historical significance would be more harmful than useful and our policy should be inclusive of such material. Given the different

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Facebook updates "community standards" for a "diverse global community"

2016-03-20 Thread
I liked Facebooks' careful definition of what constitutes nudity. Though their new policy would allow for diagrams of genitals for medical education, it would be tough for Commons to adopt similar anti-nudity laws without deleting a lot of historical and culturally relevant photographs, plus all

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Facebook updates "community standards" for a "diverse global community"

2016-03-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 19 Mar 2016 13:47, "Toby Dollmann" wrote: > Much of it is relevant for WM Commons. How so? Commons has a very different purpose to Facebook. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wikimedia-l

[Wikimedia-l] Facebook updates "community standards" for a "diverse global community"

2016-03-19 Thread Toby Dollmann
Facebook has updated its "community standards" for its 1.4 billion users. Much of it is relevant for WM Commons. "It's a challenge to maintain one set of standards that meets the needs of a diverse global community," said Monika Bickert, Facebook's head of global policy management, and Chris