On 10 Dec 2012, at 02:03, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
The news from today is that FreeBSD didn't succeed to gather enough
money during their annual fundraising [1][2].
They only started their annual fundraising campaign 5 days ago:
Furthermore, WordPress is actually not strong in the government/enterprise
space. Instead Drupal is with direct outreach to institutions. The difference
in DrupalCon vs. WordCamp SF reflect this.
WordPress presence (around 9% of all domains on the internet) in addition to a
rapid decline in
2012/12/10 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
And our competition are not various online encyclopedias -- not one as
large and as relevant as Wikipedia. Our competition are top Internet
sites, which are taking away the attention of our users.
Fortunately, no top Internet site has enough of
On Dec 9, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, FreeBSD is a part of our broader movement and Wikimedia
Foundation and Wikimedia chapters should find a way how to help them.
I suppose that Mozilla Foundation could be also interested in this
venture. Thus, I'd
On 10 December 2012 05:17, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Wordpress' strong card is its rather stable PHP-based
platform, and when you think of it, that platform is not much more
technically advanced than MediaWiki is, but it has a much more vibrant
community of users.
The CIA version added ACLs. Never say never...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 9, 2012, at 10:29 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 December 2012 05:17, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
Wordpress' strong card is its rather stable
