I have documenten my Wiki related activities for fifteen years on my blog [1]. I write argued opinions centred around my experiences. I always invite people to consider the arguments and argue their point.
At this point I find the Wikimedia Foundation increasingly intolerant of considered opinions. I made the case for other projects, considered remedies like bonuses for senior management for growth in other projects, and I do consider it a bias when everything is centred around Wikipedia and the English Wikipedia at that. I find that I am censured when I want to post to this Facebook group and I am censured when I post on Wikimedia-l. Read what I write, my arguments are to make our movement a better place. Look up what I do and have done, with 2,770,630 edits I have been deeply involved in our projects. I am censured because it is not ok for me to speak freely and say that our approach is one of bias, a bias that is detrimental to our mission. Thanks, GerardM PS it will be a relief when I find this posted on the mailinglist and when my latest blogpost gets attention on Facebook [1] https://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
