There's a whole site full of possible inspirations:
http://tabcloseddidntread.com/
https://medium.com/i-m-h-o/a30bbe8b54a5
Perhaps next year?
- d.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On 12/10/2013 03:07 AM, David Gerard wrote:
There's a whole site full of possible inspirations:
And yet:
Our donor services team haven't seen any negative emails about this
banner. Moreover adding the floating tab results in an increase in
donations of roughly 15%, one of the biggest
On 10 December 2013 14:24, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 12/10/2013 03:07 AM, David Gerard wrote:
There's a whole site full of possible inspirations:
Mind you, you are comparing apples (a small floaty reminder that /can/
overlap with part of the sidebar when scrolling) with
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 12/10/2013 03:07 AM, David Gerard wrote:
There's a whole site full of possible inspirations:
And yet:
Our donor services team haven't seen any negative emails about this
banner. Moreover adding the floating tab
On 12/10/2013 10:01 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
https://twitter.com/nyatagarasu/status/405134111796240384
It's hard to know for sure, of course, but I'm pretty sure huge
couldn't possibly refer to the minuscule floaty div MZMcBride refered
to. :-)
-- Marc
John Vandenberg wrote:
And a request for bitcoins
https://twitter.com/DrWeidinger/status/407656789274947584
For reference: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Bitcoin.
MZMcBride
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 10/12/13 14:57, David Gerard wrote:
True. However, do read the blog post on the need for caution in
answering such concerns with metrics.
- d.
And it's an excellent point to bring up. While I'm sure the fundraising
team tries to keep in mind the balance between analytics results and and
I'm not aware that there ever was such an agreement. Annoyance to users is
certainly something that we do try to minimise, and we've actually rejected
a number of designs so far this year for that reason. However we thought
carefully about this banner before testing it and considered it okay for a
Love it! Looks like there's more than one banner too:
http://imgs.xkcd.com/store_news/store_gd_g1_QG5Z.png
--
Peter Coombe
Fundraising Production Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
On 8 December 2013 19:52, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Largely unrelated: it looks like xkcd
Peter Coombe wrote:
I'm not aware that there ever was such an agreement. Annoyance to users is
certainly something that we do try to minimise, and we've actually
rejected a number of designs so far this year for that reason. However we
thought carefully about this banner before testing it and
10px #aaa;). See http://awesomescreenshot.com/01022k566a. I highly
suggest you adopt these changes.
Thanks,User:Mono
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:09:59 -0800
From: pcoo...@wikimedia.org
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banner obscuring site interface
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising banner obscuring site interface
Related: There are some issues with the design of these banners, especially
the floaty thing.Why are you using a table element? It's really wrong for
this kind of thing. Also, please commit to just one color
Hi.
I thought there was an explicit agreement that fundraising banners will
not obscure the site interface, as it's bad for usability and annoys users.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Permalink/111477931 seems to
break this agreement. What's going on?
MZMcBride
Largely unrelated: it looks like xkcd (http://xkcd.com) has spoofed the
DEAR WIKIPEDIA READERS donation banner as part of its store campaign:
http://imgs.xkcd.com/store_news/store_gd_d5_FyaR.png. :-)
MZMcBride
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
