Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking that you were referring to both the
request column and the recommendation column.
Perhaps WMF, affiliate, and community finances will be discussed as a part
of the strategy process, probably not so much during the goal-setting phase
but more during the follow-
To be clear I did only suggest to list a number for the activities the fdc
gives a comment. I e. Fill out the first column and put a not applicable in
the recommended money column.
On May 17, 2017 04:25, "Pine W" wrote:
> For what it's worth, there has been previous discussions of having externa
For what it's worth, there has been previous discussions of having external
reviews of WMF spending, such as a peer review from a similar institution.
I think that this is a good idea. This also fits in with my long-standing
hope that WMF will become more transparent with its financial expenditures
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER wrote:
> Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
>
> Rupert
>
>
>
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending funding
for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides
feedback on the draft annual pla
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
On May 15, 2017 12:21 PM, "Risker" wrote:
> Dear Wikimedians,
>
>
> The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meets twice a year to make
> recommendations about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve
> the Wikimedia movement's mission,
Dear Wikimedians,
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meets twice a year to make
recommendations about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve
the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. This is now the
9th round of allocations made by the FDC, and we met in person
