Hello,
Might I suggest that if folks want to continue talking about this, they
rename this thread, as it is no longer about Kourosh Karimkhany, and it is
just creating background noise for those of us who have no desire to
discuss the whole Wikipedia Zero freedom thing yet again?
Cheers,
Craig
Boi,
All comparisons of WP with other sources were cherry picked. They picked
articles where
the science was well established, or they picked articles which were
being edit warred to
exhaustion if you know of comparisons where that isn't the case then
cough them up.
Wikipedia happens to
On 05/04/2015 06:36, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Reliable is not an absolute. Wikipedia is in the final analysis an
encyclopaedia. It is not original research.
One can indeed engage in original research by cherry picking the sources.
Studies have indicated that
Wikipedia is as reliable as
Hoi,
Research is not what we compete with. Research is not encyclopaedic either.
The research I refer to compared a set of subjects and compared those in
several sources... Then again why bore you with information you already
could know..
Cherry picking an article from Brittanica is wonderful, it
Hoi,
Reliable is not an absolute. Wikipedia is in the final analysis an
encyclopaedia. It is not original research. Studies have indicated that
Wikipedia is as reliable as its competitors. Wikipedia does link ever more
to the VIAF indicators by the OCLC and thereby it links to the sum of all
Hi Andreas,
2015-04-02 18:25 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-04-02 15:16 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com:
As mentioned previously, what I have seen is recent additions to
No one would care about Wikipedia Zero if Wikipedia was a reliable source.
Anthony Cole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Andreas,
2015-04-02 18:25 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kolbe
Mike,
With all due respect to your longstanding work on internet issues, you said
there were no facts to support an argument that zero-rating one product,
when all others are subject to a consumer charge, suppresses competition.
I pointed out that Lohninger, AccessNow and EFF consider it obvious
2015-04-02 15:16 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com:
I pointed out that Lohninger, AccessNow and EFF consider it obvious that
there is such an effect.
Not so obvious, in my opinion.
The EFF says about Wikipedia zero that it is a laudable effort[1]
even acknowledging that it may harm
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-04-02 15:16 GMT+02:00 Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com:
I pointed out that Lohninger, AccessNow and EFF consider it obvious that
there is such an effect.
I keep hearing this argument, but what myself (and
10 matches
Mail list logo
