Re: [Wikimedia-l] Help needed to complete and expand the Wikimedia glossary

2012-11-21 Thread geni
On 20 November 2012 18:55, Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 Hi,

 The use of jargon, acronyms and other abbreviations throughout the
 Wikimedia movement is a major source of communication issues, and
 barriers to comprehension and involvement.

 The recent thread on this list about What is Product? is an example
 of this, as are initialisms that have long been known to be a barrier
 for Wikipedia newcomers.

 A way to bridge people and communities with different vocabularies is
 to write and maintain a glossary that explains jargon in plain English
 terms. We've been lacking a good and up-to-date glossary for Wikimedia
 stuff (Foundation, chapter, movement, technology, etc.).

 Therefore, I've started to clean up and expand the outdated Glossary
 on meta, but it's a lot of work, and I don't have all the answers
 myself either. I'll continue to work on it, but I'd love to get some
 help on this and to make it a collaborative effort.

 If you have a few minutes to spare, please consider helping your
 (current and future) fellow Wikimedians by writing a few definitions
 if there are terms that you can explain in plain English. Additions of
 new terms are much welcome as well:


Been done:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiSpeak


-- 
geni

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


[Wikimedia-l] Help needed to complete and expand the Wikimedia glossary

2012-11-20 Thread Guillaume Paumier
Hi,

The use of jargon, acronyms and other abbreviations throughout the
Wikimedia movement is a major source of communication issues, and
barriers to comprehension and involvement.

The recent thread on this list about What is Product? is an example
of this, as are initialisms that have long been known to be a barrier
for Wikipedia newcomers.

A way to bridge people and communities with different vocabularies is
to write and maintain a glossary that explains jargon in plain English
terms. We've been lacking a good and up-to-date glossary for Wikimedia
stuff (Foundation, chapter, movement, technology, etc.).

Therefore, I've started to clean up and expand the outdated Glossary
on meta, but it's a lot of work, and I don't have all the answers
myself either. I'll continue to work on it, but I'd love to get some
help on this and to make it a collaborative effort.

If you have a few minutes to spare, please consider helping your
(current and future) fellow Wikimedians by writing a few definitions
if there are terms that you can explain in plain English. Additions of
new terms are much welcome as well:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Glossary

Some caveats:
* As part of my work, I'm mostly interested in a glossary from a
technical perspective, so the list currently has a technical bias. I'm
hoping that by sending this message to a wider audience, people from
the whole movement will contribute to the glossary and balance it out.
* Also, I've started to clean up the glossary, but it still contains
dated terms and definitions from a few years ago (like the FundCom),
so boldly edit/remove obsolete content.

Thank you,

-- 
Guillaume Paumier
Technical Communications Manager — Wikimedia Foundation
https://donate.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l