Re: [Wikimedia-l] Legal status of Wikimeida lists [Was: Re: The other side of the crisis at WMFR]

2017-11-26 Thread Vi to
N00bs are usually taught "public" has nothing to do with copyright ;) Vito 2017-11-24 15:57 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen : > Hoi, > You deny the existence of copyright.. It being public does not mean that it > is fair game for any and all purposes. > Thanks, >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Legal status of Wikimeida lists [Was: Re: The other side of the crisis at WMFR]

2017-11-25 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, You deny the existence of copyright.. It being public does not mean that it is fair game for any and all purposes. Thanks, GerardM On 24 November 2017 at 14:39, Vi to wrote: > Archives are public, so, IMHO, the list is. > > Vito > > 2017-11-24 11:11 GMT+01:00

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Legal status of Wikimeida lists [Was: Re: The other side of the crisis at WMFR]

2017-11-24 Thread Tim Landscheidt
mathieu stumpf guntz wrote: >> I think it was important to re-explain all those points so >> that the community, which is - again - unnecessarily taken >> as witness, is not deceived by a scenario built from >> scratch. >> Again, to discredit the movement by such

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Legal status of Wikimeida lists [Was: Re: The other side of the crisis at WMFR]

2017-11-24 Thread Vi to
Archives are public, so, IMHO, the list is. Vito 2017-11-24 11:11 GMT+01:00 mathieu stumpf guntz < psychosl...@culture-libre.org>: > Saluton ĉiuj, > > Le 23/11/2017 à 20:54, Emeric Vallespi a écrit : > >> I think it was important to re-explain all those points so that the >> community, which is

[Wikimedia-l] Legal status of Wikimeida lists [Was: Re: The other side of the crisis at WMFR]

2017-11-24 Thread mathieu stumpf guntz
Saluton ĉiuj, Le 23/11/2017 à 20:54, Emeric Vallespi a écrit : I think it was important to re-explain all those points so that the community, which is - again - unnecessarily taken as witness, is not deceived by a scenario built from scratch. Again, to discredit the movement by such erroneous