Hello all,
An issue this raises for me is this: If we're to include copyright
information on blog posts regarding the use of CC licensed images, is this
going to have to be applied to all Wikipedia articles illustrated with
images too? Apologies if I've missed something here.
Thanks,
Stevie
On
On 23 January 2013 10:10, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Hello all,
An issue this raises for me is this: If we're to include copyright
information on blog posts regarding the use of CC licensed images, is this
going to have to be applied to all Wikipedia articles
On 23/01/2013 12:39, Richard Symonds wrote:
My initial question was aimed to find out what sort of attribution we'd
need to do on Wikimedia UK sites - eg, uk.wikimedia.org and
blog.wikimedia.org.
I'm not really *keen* on changing policy on Wikipedia. That's not my job!
In that case just do
On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the
Creative Commons license.
Yeah, but Commons pulls in stuff from other
And I'm also unsure all the upload wizards have the same text?
2013/1/22 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is
I've always considered this poor policy on the part of Wikipedia; a sort of
intellectual grab that we do so well :(
I've uploaded images before by great photographers, after working to obtain
their permission, and make a point of crediting them when inserting the
image into the article - partly
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
All,
I have a question for you which I am sure you will enjoy discussing. It's
about licencing.
Wikimedia sites do not use a 'byline' on their images - for example,
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
- Does anyone have any input on this?
- Has this discussion been had before, if so,
On 22/01/2013 18:28, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
- Does anyone have any input on this?
-
2013/1/22 ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
On 22/01/2013 18:28, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable
as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
Hi,
great question, Richard! Seconding Matthew's comment on WMF blog policy: At
Wikimedia Deutschland we adopted the bottom notes for posts with multiple
images[1]. As a general rule, we include attribution in the bylines[2].
Adding yet another aspect to sufficient CC licensing, let's not forget
11 matches
Mail list logo
