2013/2/24 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com:
Why We don't change your license in pages that gonna receive this content?
(I know this is not the best license ever made, but why always the other
need to be adapt to us, not the opposite?)
Using GPL license for textual content
Ok, I really understand that, but with they those GFDL? What we can do?
On 24 February 2013 06:54, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/24 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com:
Why We don't change your license in pages that gonna receive this
content?
(I know this
Hello,
One of my favorite wikimedia project is the wiktionary, I probably use
it everyday and I like to contribute on the french chapter here and
there.
As I'm learning esperanto, I wanted to improve the french wiktionary on
this topic. My first thought was to begin by gathering a list of
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
One of my favorite wikimedia project is the wiktionary, I probably use
it everyday and I like to contribute on the french chapter here and
there.
As I'm learning esperanto, I wanted to improve the french
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
Unfortunately, this dictionary is under GPL which is a well known free
license (but a strange choice for a non-software project). So I would
like to know, can I mix up a GPL content with a CC-by-sa page (in cases
where such a page
On 23 February 2013 20:29, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a few cases where sharealike licenses include provisions for
compatible licenses. Sadly, the license owners don't seem too interested
in advacing in that front.
Not completely, to be fair - e.g. GFDL 1.3 including a
