[Wikimedia-l] Re: Could the broad use of ChatGPT mean more accesses to Wikipedia?

2023-05-18 Thread Risker
(Apologies - accidentally deleted, content recovered) From: Maryana Pinchuk To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 23:59:20 - Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Could the broad use of ChatGPT mean more accesses to Wikipedia? Hi Anders & Ziko, I do think you're right

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Could the broad use of ChatGPT mean more accesses to Wikipedia?

2023-05-18 Thread Risker
(Apologies, this was accidentally deleted but we have recovered the content) -- Forwarded message -- From: Maryana Pinchuk To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 23:39:43 - Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikianswers Proposal Hi all, Just a quick

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Could the broad use of ChatGPT mean more accesses to Wikipedia?

2023-05-15 Thread Galder Gonzalez LarraƱaga
There's yet another option: a simple Google search algorithm change can promote or hide a language from the results. We have seen it at Basque (and Catalan) Wikipedias, after they dediced to show the Spanish language result even if you search in Basque and the article exists. As we can't know

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Could the broad use of ChatGPT mean more accesses to Wikipedia?

2023-05-15 Thread Anders Wennersten
Thanks Ziko for your reply, which very much echo my own worry. If you try the ChatGPTt with the question amended with "Include a link to Wikipedia" you find the answer is better for questioner and makes a nice link to Wikipedia. So if we are worried over your option A, we could enter 10

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Could the broad use of ChatGPT mean more accesses to Wikipedia?

2023-05-15 Thread Ziko van Dijk
Dear Anders, Thank you for your interesting question - we have been wondering for some time what AI will mean for the future of the (entire) Wikimedia movement. Whether your observation is correct is also something I can only speculate about. Possibly such a growth is rather a sign of transition.