On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 1:51 PM Samuel Klein wrote:
> I wanted to clarify that it is not 3% of all donors that go on to make an
>> unreverted edit. All donors are directed to a “Thank You” page after their
>> donations, which includes several calls-to-action. This year, we included
>> a call
>
> I wanted to clarify that it is not 3% of all donors that go on to make an
> unreverted edit. All donors are directed to a “Thank You” page after their
> donations, which includes several calls-to-action. This year, we included
> a call to “Try editing Wikipedia”. Due to the way that we
All questioning of the BoT and their replies so far have indicated no
connection between their review and the movement charter process, so the
review is supposedly only designed as a temporary measure...
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 17:14, Strainu wrote:
>
>
> În mie., 27 mar. 2024 la 12:08, Philip
Thank you, SJ, for your involvement and thorough review of the Thank You
page experiment results! We were particularly delighted to find that some
donors exhibit an interest in editing. As Victoria highlights, the edits
made by donors experience a significantly lower revert rate compared to
those
În mie., 27 mar. 2024 la 12:08, Philip Kopetzky
a scris:
> Hi Asaf!
>
> Yes, thanks for pointing this out! Hopefully with regional networks in
> place this will also create a tighter net to catch these kind of questions
> and make affiliate leaders not feel left alone.
> And maybe the movement
Hi Asaf!
Yes, thanks for pointing this out! Hopefully with regional networks in
place this will also create a tighter net to catch these kind of questions
and make affiliate leaders not feel left alone.
And maybe the movement charter draft even includes an affiliates model that
also outlines one
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 5:05 PM Philip Kopetzky
wrote:
> ** We still have no resources to onboard new affiliates. Once a new one is
> approved, they are left alone to fend for themselves.
>
This is not *quite* true. New affiliates are pointed to this page
Hi!
Concerning the point about the WMF BoT's perspective on the Global Council,
the European affiliates discussed these perspectives at a recent online
meeting last Monday. Here's a summary of this discussion (the points I
highlight here are my personal editing choice, you can find a link to the
As far as I remember, yes—the rate of account creation, making more than
one edit, and the percentage of unreverted edits was higher than in other
methods. I think this is a spectacular result and a completely unexpected
source for the new editors.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:47 AM Samuel Klein
These updates keep getting better. (I left out the board updates from my
recent thanks for regular newsletters lifting all of our boats :)
I realize this is the smallest footnote of a long and significant update,
but: does this mean *3% of donors* who saw a thank-you note inviting them
to edit
10 matches
Mail list logo
