I was reacting to Gerard , i did not necessarily take into account the
I was talking about the wikipedia in a more general fashion
and that refernce to religion was a paraphrased quotation from prof
I sorry if it did indeed leap from the RFC to a more general
I wholeheartedly agree with Gerard.
During the conference by the KNAW ( academy of sciences) in Amsterdam
when the Wikipedia community received from HM Willem Alexander of the
Netherlands the Erasmusaward
Philosofy Professer Jos De Mul ( Erasmus university of Rotterdam) , who
When this is it, when these people get away with it, their behaviour is as
bad as much of what we have seen lately. I do not care who they are. There
is too much going where people decide on policies and effectively destroy
We do no longer care about our quality, it is all about
Gerard not sure what you mean? In the Wikipedia world if a RfC is either
poorly formed or poorly participated in than it is not uncommon for another
one to occur.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> When it is only a nominal
When it is only a nominal consideration but mostly a chuckle, what does it
say about the validity of those people and their assumptions? This is
exactly the infuriating kind of response that turns people off the
On 12 March 2016 at 14:45, Marc A. Pelletier
Thanks, Marc. That's a relief.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
> On 2016-03-12 6:31 AM, Anthony Cole wrote:
>> I've lost track of where that's at.
> Well, there was a consultation involving too few people that had a slight
I've lost track of where that's at.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com