On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Bishakha Datta bishakhada...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:33 AM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a question that came up during today's US GLAM consortium
meeting:
what's the current status of the 'movement
Phoebe,
As Bishakha indicated, this is still actively being discussed amongst AffCom
and WMF folks. Most of what's being discussed is based on on-wiki comments -
but the actual conversations are happening via email (AffCom mailing list) and
face-to-face conversations. My understanding is this
Hi all,
Here is a question that came up during today's US GLAM consortium meeting:
what's the current status of the 'movement partners' affiliation?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Movement_Partners
Is recognition of movement partners something that AffComm will be
On 4/29/13 1:03 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a question that came up during today's US GLAM consortium meeting:
what's the current status of the 'movement partners' affiliation?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models/Movement_Partners
Is recognition of movement
Hello,
I am not quite sure what will be the future of the Movement partners. I
can imagine that a museum (for example) can be a partner in an initiative
set up by the WMF, a chapter or a thorg.
WMNL and Teylers Museum together started the Teylers Challenge, a edit
competition. The museum could
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:33 AM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a question that came up during today's US GLAM consortium meeting:
what's the current status of the 'movement partners' affiliation?
