Hi Peter,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Peter Krautzberger
wrote:
>> While I can understand that the SVG images were orginally optimized of
>> inline use, I do not see any principal reason why inline SVG's are
>> better.
>
> a) all rendering issues have been due to SVGs not being linine
That's
Peter,
On 10/27/2014 03:08 AM, Peter Krautzberger wrote:
> Gabriel wrote:
>
>> It would also be nice to reduce the size of the SVG fall-back images,
> which are
>> currently about 50% larger than the (low-resolution) PNGs.
>
> I think this only holds for smaller equations. For more complex equa
Amir,
On 10/25/2014 01:16 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> As a follow-up to the discussions about the new Math rendering options, I'd
> like to raise the question of how to write the preferences in way that will
> really be helpful to the users.
>
> I made a little patch at
> https://gerrit.wikimedi
As a follow-up to the discussions about the new Math rendering options, I'd
like to raise the question of how to write the preferences in way that will
really be helpful to the users.
I made a little patch at
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/167024/
It only fixes some minor things, and the prob
