Hi SJ,
Dear all,
I've have posted WMDE's feedback on the discussion pages, respectively:
a) for the proposal template: http://meta.wikimedia.org/**
wiki/Template_talk:FDC_**proposal_form_v1http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:FDC_proposal_form_v1
*As to content:*
**The question
Dear all,
in the unlikely case that Wikimedia Deutschland's report pages[1] are not
on your personal Meta-Wiki watchlist, you might have missed our September
issue. Well, here's an email taxi to pick you up and take you to an
overview of what we've been working on in the past few weeks. Please
Hi,
As agreed, the WMF is also sending their non-core program to the
FDC approval, you can see their proposal here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals/2012-2013_round1/Wikimedia_Foundation/Proposal_form
But I'm asking myself, that's all what we consider as non-core? I didn't
On 8 October 2012 12:18, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems clear to me, based on the end result and what foundation board and
senior staff have said, that they decided an account of money they wanted
to request from the FDC and then decided what to designate as non-core so
Dear Sue,
I partially disagree with the statement we're not in a position where we need
to make extraordinarily difficult choices about whether to preserve
If you consider the WMF financial reserves it's true, but for what I
understand, the FDC should decide about the distribution of the
Here's the relevant part of the Annual Plan FAQ:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2012-2013_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers#What_is_the_impact_of_the_FDC_on_this_plan.3F
(see
in particular the items How are core and non-core defined? and Why is
non-core defined the way it is? Doesn’t it make
Hi mike,
you do realize that all images are stripped on this mailing list? If you
want to mention images, it is best to link to the version on Commons
(although I don't feel that the mailing list is an effective place to
discuss this at all)
Best,
Lodewijk
2012/10/7 Mike Dupont
In Anasuyas mail sent out, otherwise OK, she mentions comments on the FDC or the
proposal process itself should go to FDC staff wikipage. Should it not go to the
FDC commmeets wikipage?
I have thought we FDC members after we have prepared the recommendation should
make a review/evaluation
Please ignore this mail, that was meant only for our FDC internal mail
Anders
Anders Wennersten skrev 2012-10-09 07:44:
In Anasuyas mail sent out, otherwise OK, she mentions comments on the
FDC or the proposal process itself should go to FDC staff wikipage.
Should it not go to the FDC
