On 10/17/12 10:26 PM, James Heilman wrote:
We really need a plagiarism detection tool so that we can make sure our
sources are not simply "copy and pastes" of older versions of Wikipedia.
Today I was happily improving our article on pneumonia as I have a day off.
I came across a recommendation th
I find this rather frightening, as it implies that the programs undertaken
by the Wikimedia Foundation recently were not successful and wasted funds.
This is open to debate, but if these programs were successful in 'editor
engagement' why would we get rid of them?
(It seems like they weren't.)
Me
On Oct 20, 2012 6:36 PM, "Mono" wrote:
>
> The WMF should spend less time thinking about what to do and more time
> doing it. That means they can't do everything under the moon. But everyone
> knows that big things need to happen.
>
Well said. That is precisely why these changes are being propos
