Hum yes. We wanted Wikimedia Medicine, than where not able to get
permission to us Wikimedia so changed it to Wiki Medicine, NY state did not
like Medicine (and if we wanted to use it we needed permission from some
medical board) so abbreviated that as well giving us Wiki Med. NY state
added the
The April fundraiser is on translated messages IIRC. Your suggestion is not at
all practical for the fundraising team to implement.
Also it is terrible idea, which ignores the high costs of planning to hold
deliberations in a few months which is designed to nullify the results of
recently
Leinonen Teemu, 29/12/2012 15:20:
Hi,
I think the thematic organizations are good for the movement. Could the naming
of the affiliated thematic organizations be primary based on the Wikipedia
Portal namespaces (from all the Wikipedia's in different languages)?
See
I am not affiliated with Wiki Med. However as an American, Health to my ear
means scammy quacky bullshit that wants to pretend it is medicine for the $$$.
There are real reasons NY does not let an organization use the title Medicine
without approval from the medical board. And all those
On 29.12.2012, at 9.35, birgitte...@yahoo.com birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am not affiliated with Wiki Med. However as an American, Health to my ear
means scammy quacky bullshit that wants to pretend it is medicine for the $$$.
OK. I am sure in the US the World *Health* Organization is also
I'm confident to see soon a Wikimedia Medicine as the model for some
other thematic organizations, and I am curious how it will evolve.
Maybe I will never understand what is a foundation in the US. In the
Netherlands or Germany, we distinguish between an association (with
members) and a foundation
On 12/29/12 1:15 AM, David Gerard wrote:
On 29 December 2012 00:05, James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes so Wiki Med Foundation Inc incorporated Dec 19, 2012 and we had our
Isn't the name just a little prone to confusion with Wikimedia Foundation?
- d.
On 12/29/12 6:05 PM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.comwrote:
At the same time, Wiki is not a trademarked term and the term Foundation
is a pretty usual one as well (in particular if it is indeed a
Foundation...).
You're correct as
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.comwrote:
On 12/29/12 6:05 PM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com
wrote:
At the same time, Wiki is not a trademarked term and the term
Foundation
is a pretty usual
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:45 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
How about for the April fundraiser, instead of setting a dollar value
goal, we agree to use multivariate analysis instead of A/B testing to
optimize the messaging from volunteer submissions in advance, then run
the whole
____ _ _ _ _
/ / /\ \ \(_)| | __(_) (_) _ _____
\ \/ \/ /| || |/ /| ||_ /| || '_ \ / _ \
\ /\ / | ||| | / / | || | | || __/
\/ \/ |_||_|\_\|_|/___||_||_| |_|
Samuel Klein wrote:
It seems guaranteed to cause confusion.
Wiki Med strikes me as the second most confusing possible name for an
associated group.
The most confusing would be a multimedia / news organization named Wiki
Media.
I hope the medical group will change its name officially and
____ _ _ _ _
/ / /\ \ \(_)| | __(_) (_) _ _____
\ \/ \/ /| || |/ /| ||_ /| || '_ \ / _ \
\ /\ / | ||| | / / | || | | || __/
\/ \/ |_||_|\_\|_|/___||_||_| |_|
On Dec 29, 2012 2:22 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Samuel Klein wrote:
It seems guaranteed to cause confusion.
Wiki Med strikes me as the second most confusing possible name for an
associated group.
The most confusing would be a multimedia / news organization named Wiki
Le 29/12/2012 17:01, Leslie Carr a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:45 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
How about for the April fundraiser, instead of setting a dollar value
goal, we agree to use multivariate analysis instead of A/B testing to
optimize the messaging from volunteer
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
That's accurate. But there's no dentists onsite, no massage center, no
chefs, no barista making my latte, etc, etc
I'm a pretty good barista, so for a small fee, I'd be happy to make your
coffee ;)
Nathan,
I agree that other qualitative and quantitative information would be helpful
and I hope that Sj or other trustees will comment on the level of trustee
engagement.
From what I've seen in the public records, the attendance of WMF trustees at
Board events seems to be fairly good, but
17 matches
Mail list logo
